News

Sunday 2026-10-11

06:00 AM

Kanji of the Day: 早 [Kanji of the Day]

早

✍6

小1

early, fast

ソウ サッ

はや.い はや はや- はや.まる はや.める さ-

早く   (はやく)   —   early
早い   (はやい)   —   fast
早期   (そうき)   —   early stage
早朝   (そうちょう)   —   early morning
早稲田   (わさだ)   —   field of early-blooming (or ripening) rice
早速   (さっそく)   —   at once
早めに   (はやめに)   —   a little early
早くも   (はやくも)   —   already
早々   (そうそう)   —   as soon as...
早急   (さっきゅう)   —   immediate

Generated with kanjioftheday by Douglas Perkins.

Kanji of the Day: 滑 [Kanji of the Day]

滑

✍13

中学

slippery, slide, slip, fail exam

カツ コツ

すべ.る なめ.らか

滑走   (かっそう)   —   gliding
滑り   (すべり)   —   sliding
滑らか   (すべらか)   —   smooth (of a surface)
滑走路   (かっそうろ)   —   runway
滑る   (すべる)   —   to glide
円滑   (えんかつ)   —   smooth
滑り出し   (すべりだし)   —   start
地滑り   (じすべり)   —   landslide
滑り台   (すべりだい)   —   slide
滑稽   (こっけい)   —   funny

Generated with kanjioftheday by Douglas Perkins.

02:00 AM

Productive dissatisfaction [Seth Godin's Blog on marketing, tribes and respect]

When focused on the things we can change, dissatisfaction is a powerful tool.

Accepting everything else–the parts we can’t or won’t change–reserves our energy for the places where it’s useful.

The tricky part is telling them apart and then focusing our agency and leverage on the useful.

Solving problems for others is how we create value.

      

Just for Skeets and Giggles (10.10.26) [The Status Kuo]

I’ve heard the bit about living above us in Canada. The rejoinder was new to me, which feels about right.

IMG_2632.jpeg

Trump aired ads paid for by U.S. taxpayers (he says he’ll pay for them with money from MAGA Inc., but he’s a liar, so…). The ads were meant to portray him as a serious president, so Jimmy Kimmel corrected the record.

Image.heic

Costume season is almost here. Need some ideas?

Image.heic

For decor, this raises the bar.

Image.heic

As the midterms approach, Trump keeps making things worse for his party.

Image.png

He even fantasized aloud about Iran nuking big blue California cities like Los Angeles and San Diego while his MAGA followers cheered.

Image.heic

Iran, if you need directions…

IMG_2721.jpeg

The regime can’t resist these silly boasts that make for easy targets.

IMG_2812.jpeg

Trump keeps trying to get us to rename things.

IMG_2850.jpeg

But if we’re renaming things,

Image.heic

So we’re not allowed to say “artificial” anymore, huh?

Image.heic

Speaker Mike Johnson may soon be out of a job. Though he barely had one to begin with.

Image.heic

Russia keeps putting the world at risk, but Andy Borowitz has a solution.

Facebook.png

The perfect caption for an already hilarious moment.

Image.heic

If Sen. Eric Schmitt thinks we’re gonna forget what he tried to do to Jack Smith, he’s in for another rude collision with reality.

Image.heic

That epic fail keeps delivering.

Image.heic

Meanwhile, Jack Smith is living his best life, as a hero to the people.

Image.heic

There always seems to be one personality in Trump’s MAGA circle who steals the headlines and spotlight, and this week it was Kimberly Guilfoyle, Don Trump Jr.’s former fiancée:

The Daily Show with the recap:

Image.heic

I’m sure it’s not the last we’ve heard about that story… the best is yet to come!

Speaking of MAGA people with scary amounts of work done on their faces,

Image.heic

These women decry drag queens’ supposed influence on kids, yet after all that surgeries, many end up looking like drag queens themselves. On that subject,

Image.heic

Think politics is weird now? Remember this headline.

Image.heic

My sister and I were just discussing how Labour is starting to talk about undoing Brexit.

Image.heic

One of the sacrifices we make in donating to save our democracy is the barrage of emails and texts we get from candidates. So let’s have a little fun with that (while still taking a breath and continuing to donate, yes).

Image.heic
IMG_2716.jpeg
IMG_2717.jpeg

It’s the midterms, and I am working my tail off! If you’d like to show your thanks for my efforts, consider becoming a paid subscriber to The Status Kuo if you’re not already. Each day I lose a few folks who for various reasons can’t renew their support, so to keep this project healthy, I need a few new supporters every day to replace them! I’m hoping for three new ones today, just to counter the attrition! If you’ve read my column for free for some time, please consider becoming one of my heroes today with a paid subscription. My little family sure would appreciate it!

Subscribe now

On to the doggos!

It’s fall allergy season. Don’t let it bowl you over!

Image.heic

I would totally watch a corgi version of this classic. (Instagram link here.)

Image.heic

Usain’ that Banana was that far ahead?

Image.heic

I can barely get my corgi to keep a costume on for five minutes. These pups are well trained! And adorable.

Image.heic

For reference, here’s Windsor two years ago as the crocodile from Peter Pan.

And last year as a Minion…

This dog didn’t know she’d become an internet sensation just for ghosting with her owner.

IMG_2837.jpeg

Dogs have friends beyond their humans, of course.

Image.heic

Here’s your awww moment for the week.

Image.heic

Fortunately, my cat would not love this. If yours would, here’s an idea for that special day:

Image.heic

The big one had an inflated sense of himself.

Image.heic

I’m amazed at how chill this cat is about this. The look is amazing.

Image.heic

Of course it went for one of the reddish ones, right?

Image.heic

This photo shoot took an unexpected turn in meer moments.

Image.heic

Oh, the details here! Talk about Puffin’ Stuff…

Image.heic

Some fishy human humor…

Image.heic

Beware what lurks beneath…

Image.heic

I plan to do this with my kids if they ever act like this.

Image.heic

Managers and direct reports nowadays.

Image.heic

This comment won the internet back in its early days.

6aa50b86-237c-45bd-9377-4caef85ab199.jpeg

Great. Now I see them everywhere.

Image.heic

This happened to me the other day in Michaels.

Image.heic

My feed keeps serving up British humor, so here are a few to share! This one is particularly funny given how proper many Brits are.

Image.heic

My favorite linguistic commentator and comic, Michael McIntyre!

Image.heic

If you haven’t watched “Cunk on Life” or any of Philomena Cunk’s other series, here’s a classic. I could not keep a straight face on either side of this interview.

Image.heic

To wrap things up, a dad joke for the erudite!

Image.heic

Really, it’s NONSTOP ROCK ‘N’ ROLL, right?

Have a great weekend!

Jay

Saturday 2026-10-10

02:00 PM

The Violence Is the Point [The Status Kuo]

Photo courtesy of CNN

Many have long predicted that, as Trump loses his grip on power and grows ever more cornered, he would begin to lash out. Things would turn even darker and uglier than before, which is saying something. True to form, the regime has begun to rummage through its toolbox to deploy threats, spectacle and violence ahead of the midterm elections, plunging the country further into moral darkness.

Trump’s numbers have turned truly dismal. His approval sits at 31 percent in the latest AP-NORC poll and at 32 percent in Reuters/Ipsos polling, the lowest of his political career. The midterms are now less than four weeks away.

This week, Trump has riled up crowds at his rallies by suggesting Iran could “take out” Los Angeles and San Diego. Yesterday, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth added to the grotesque show by declaring that the execution of the Fort Hood killer would be public, with the military livestreaming it from the site of the 2009 murders.

Immigrants are again the regime’s targets. On Thursday, Trump told his followers that Minnesota was being taken over by Somali immigrants and urged residents to act. “Fight back Minnesota, fight back!” he urged. Meanwhile, ICE has launched Operation Safe California, with officers “told to go after anybody.”

Government-driven violence, cruelty and spectacle are horrifying in any civil society. But, as historians and political scientists explain, they can also signal that an autocratic regime is failing and nearing its own collapse.

Subscribe now

The execution will be televised

In November 2009, Nidal Hasan, an Army psychiatrist, opened fire on soldiers at Fort Hood, Texas. He later said he acted to protect Taliban fighters from U.S. forces. In 2013, a military jury convicted Hasan of 13 counts of premeditated murder and 32 counts of attempted murder. He was sentenced to death. If carried out, his execution would be the first by the U.S. military in more than 60 years.

The Army set Hasan’s execution for Thursday, Dec. 3, at 1 p.m. Central time at Fort Hood. Hegseth called the choice a “no-brainer” because it matches the approximate time, weekday and place of Hasan’s 2009 attack. Then he went further. He declared the execution would be “public” because “people need to understand that there’s serious consequences for these types of things.” Asked whether Hasan had made any final requests, Hegseth answered: “Don’t care.”

No legal execution in American history has been broadcast live, and the country’s last public execution took place in 1937. The Pentagon has not said where the stream would be hosted. Asked about the livestream, the White House referred questions to the Pentagon.

The U.N. human rights office released a statement warning that livestreaming an execution “would breach the absolute prohibition of torture.” Army regulations also bar anyone under 18 from witnessing an execution, raising questions about an unrestricted livestream.

Geoffrey Corn, a former member of the Judge Advocate General’s Corps who now teaches law at Texas Tech, told CBS News that turning the execution into a public spectacle “echoes of the past we seem to have put behind us.”

Make America Great Again apparently means bringing back public hangings.

The Dec. 3 date may not hold. Hasan could file a habeas petition in civilian federal court, which could significantly delay the execution. Hegseth’s tough talk about livestreaming Hasan’s death may be all show.

Trump himself approved Hegseth’s recommendation of death by firing squad, but when other countries carry out public executions, he has criticized them. He even pointed to the possibility of the Iranian government executing protesters as a rationale for the military action he launched in late February.

A pogrom program

Trump’s post calling on Minnesotans to “fight back” against their Somali neighbors came a day after the regime announced the arrest of Sheikhdoon Abdullahi Mohamud, an 18-year-old U.S. citizen of Somali heritage. He is accused of plotting an ISIS-inspired attack at the Mall of America, with authorities claiming he accepted an AK-47-style rifle and roughly 200 rounds of ammunition from an undercover FBI employee posing as an ISIS member. Twin Cities authorities have also linked a recent string of nonfatal shootings, including one outside a high school football stadium, to gangs in East African communities.

From these incidents, Trump delivered his verdict on the entire community. He claimed Somali immigrants had brought violence, murder and mayhem to the state. He labeled Gov. Tim Walz “an incompetent thief” and told Minnesotans their Somali neighbors held them in contempt: “They view you as weak and stupid people.” Trump urged, “Fight back, Minnesota, fight back!” while promising the federal government would come to their rescue.

We need to be clear-eyed about what this is. A president urging residents to “fight back” against neighbors defined by their ethnicity, with federal force promised as backup, lays the groundwork for a pogrom.

Much as Trump wants to “other” that community, most of those Somali neighbors are U.S. citizens. About 58 percent of Somalis in Minnesota were born in the United States, and 87 percent of those born abroad are naturalized citizens.

The post caps nearly a year of escalations by the president. Last November, Trump announced he was ending Temporary Protected Status for Somalis in Minnesota. He claimed without evidence that “Somalian gangs are roving the streets looking for ‘prey.’” That rhetoric, along with a viral video’s claims about Somali-run child care centers—claims that Vice President JD Vance amplified and state inspectors later contradicted—set the stage for Operation Metro Surge, the federal immigration crackdown in the Twin Cities that ran from December through February. During that operation, federal agents killed two Minnesotans, Renee Good and Alex Pretti. The federal government then hindered the investigations while smearing the names of the victims.

Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison answered the offer of “Federal help” by noting, “We’ve seen what Trump’s government coming to the ‘rescue’ looks like.” Gov. Walz keenly observed that the president is “lashing out at blue states because he can’t land a punch on America’s actual enemies.”

California in the crosshairs

As I wrote earlier this week, Trump has been tossing red meat to his base during rallies by fantasizing about destroying entire U.S. population centers. Defending the gas prices that his Iran war has driven up, Trump told a rally in Grand Island, Nebraska, “Let them take out Los Angeles; let them take out San Diego”—and the crowd cheered.

As I noted in my piece, Trump had been workshopping that line. Three days earlier in Mobile, Alabama, he told a crowd that high oil prices were a small price next to Iran using a nuclear weapon on their city, and that crowd remained quiet. By contrast, the Nebraska crowd, told about possible attacks on two Democratic-run cities more than 1,000 miles away, applauded. To paraphrase Voltaire, Trump is conditioning his base to accept absurdities so that it will accept atrocities.

Trump has since repeated his fantasy of Los Angeles and San Diego being “taken out.” Two days later in San Antonio, he dispelled any notion that he had misspoken earlier or was somehow unclear, as mainstream outlets had suggested. He again conjured the destruction of those cities before claiming he would prevent it:

You want to see trauma? You want to see problems? And I said it the other day, let them hit a missile into San Diego or Los Angeles on the way. You want to see a horror show? You wanna see problems? Let them hit San Diego. Let them hit Los Angeles. You want to see some bad things happen? You want to see a country in free fall? We’re not going to let that happen, we protect our cities, we protect our country, we’re not letting that happen.”

While Trump has been targeting California rhetorically, ICE has been moving aggressively within the state. It launched Operation Safe California, set to last at least 45 days, with ICE leadership instructing officers to arrest every immigrant they encounter who is in the country illegally, regardless of criminal history. One source summed up the directive in three words: “Management want numbers.” DHS would neither confirm nor deny the operation’s existence, but big “numbers” have led to widespread abuses before. When White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller directed ICE to arrest 3,000 immigrants a day last year, that quota overwhelmed the agency and produced degrading detention conditions.

Amid the stepped-up enforcement, masked ICE officers have swept through the cities of Santa Maria and nearby Guadalupe, arresting at least 17 people. In one operation, they detained the parent of an Allan Hancock College student in a campus parking lot and left before college officials could respond. Later that day, arrests took place in residential neighborhoods, outside apartment buildings, near a health center, at workplaces and near a popular Mexican grocery. California Senate President Pro Tem Monique Limón, responding to the Allan Hancock College detention, declared that “a student has been ripped away from their parent.”

As I wrote yesterday, voting rights groups pointed out that the detention at Allan Hancock College took place in the same area voters had to pass through to reach a ballot drop box during the first week of early voting.

Biddeford, Maine, shows where arresting “anybody” can lead. On the morning of July 13, ICE agents surveilling someone else’s home stopped Johan Sebastián Durán Guerrero, a young Colombian father, as he drove away, and an officer shot him dead. He was not the person ICE was looking for. A neighbor who first saw the encounter from his window heard him tell agents as they pulled him from the car, “I tried to stop.” Another neighbor told the AP she watched his wife collapse beside his body: “I watched a wife fall to her knees.” Durán Guerrero left behind a 3-year-old daughter.

Violence where power fails

Historians and political scientists reviewing the regime’s recent escalations would recognize a familiar pattern.

In “On Violence,” which grew out of a 1969 essay, political theorist Hannah Arendt argued that power and violence are opposites. Power, as she defined it, belongs to people acting together, and it lasts only as long as the group holds. Violence, by contrast, stands in for power once that cooperation starts to slip. “Violence appears where power is in jeopardy,” she wrote, “but left to its own course its end is the disappearance of power.”

Political scientists have since measured the same dynamic. Governments’ use of repression to answer threats to their power and the status quo is so common that scholars gave it a name: the Law of Coercive Responsiveness. Christian Davenport, the University of Michigan political scientist most associated with the dynamic, notes that dissent “has increased repression in every single investigation of the topic,” making it “perhaps the only law” in the study of how states and dissidents interact. His study of the United States from 1948 to 1982 found something more unsettling. Repression tracked the threats that officials declared through speeches, hearings and laws more closely than anything protesters actually did. When those political threats were present, he wrote, “repression increased, regardless of behavioral threats.” A Somali “takeover” of Minnesota, an “invasion” at the border, two dead citizens branded “domestic terrorists”—in each case, the regime manufactures the threat and the crackdown follows.

Ruth Ben-Ghiat’s “Strongmen” follows authoritarian leaders from Mussolini to the present, from their rise through their rule to their fall. She identified Trump’s reliance on violence years ago. In the tradition of the fascists, she wrote, he uses his rallies to “train his followers to see violence in a positive light.” That’s why he’s switched from invoking Mobile, Alabama, as a target of nuclear annihilation to a bit about two blue California cities.

Last August, I wrote in The Big Picture about “sadopopulism,” the term coined by historian Timothy Snyder, now at the University of Toronto. He describes it as a kind of “populism where people actually don’t get anything except more pain.” The regime cannot deliver real gains, so it rations suffering and offers its base the consolation of watching others hurt more. I argued then that public opinion “is a barometer of whether Trump’s policies, including sadopopulism, are working or failing.” The barometer now reads failure, and so the regime has doubled down and is escalating.

Spectacle has always been part of the method. As I noted, sadopopulism explains the public lynchings of Black Americans in the Jim Crow South, which white families attended “with their children in tow, as if attending a happy social gathering.” Philosopher Jason Stanley, also at the University of Toronto, told Mother Jones that the regime’s goal is to get the public “to buy into the fun of sadism.”

We’ve moved from UFC bouts on the White House lawn, to turning nuked California cities into a crowd pleaser to the ultimate spectacle of a planned public execution. In each case, the audience matters as much as the event, if not more. A Law & Society Review study of American executions from 1833 to 1937 found, for example, that the audience was itself part of the event, and that it could grant or deny legitimacy to the execution and to capital punishment as a whole. That’s the very reason why, in December, Hegseth hopes to give Hasan’s execution an audience of anyone with an internet connection.

How the end phase could go

The most extreme historical precedent for what we are witnessing is the Third Reich’s final year, when the violence ramped up even as the regime disintegrated. In “The End,” historian Ian Kershaw follows Germany from the failed July 1944 plot against Hitler to the surrender in May 1945, asking why the regime kept fighting long after defeat was obvious. Part of his answer was terror. The repression the Nazis had used across occupied Europe ultimately turned back on the German people themselves. Another factor was loyalty. Hitler’s charismatic rule bound his lieutenants to him so tightly that they had no future without him.

Rising state violence may signal the possible end of a repressive regime, but there’s an important caveat. Escalating violence brings regime collapse only some of the time. Civil resistance expert Erica Chenoweth’s 2011 analysis of the Arab Spring uprisings found that repression slowed or ended movements in Bahrain, Saudi Arabia and Iran, for example. In Egypt, by contrast, mass mobilization grew despite deadly repression, and Hosni Mubarak lost both his legitimacy and his authority over his own security forces. Chenoweth explained that the outcome turns on how a movement responds. When killings of unarmed demonstrators draw 10 times more people into the streets, “that’s called backfire.”

The American civil rights movement understood that dynamic. As I wrote last year, the Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr. deliberately sought out the South’s worst sheriffs, betting that their brutality toward peaceful marchers would reach living rooms across the country and change public opinion. We saw a version of that in Minneapolis this year, where the violence of the regime was undeniable, captured on video, as its agents shot and killed Renee Good and Alex Pretti in cold blood on city streets. In the wake of those killings, Homeland Security was forced to back down, its leaders chastised and, in Kristi Noem’s and Greg Bovino’s cases, sent packing.

Trump is now in a dangerous spiral. As his calls for violence increase, as ICE agents fan out ahead of the midterms, and as he even invites audiences to executions and fantasizes about terrorist strikes within our borders, resistance may also grow. It may eventually spill into the streets, particularly if he attempts to subvert the midterm results. At such an inflection point, Trump will be tempted to respond with greater repression, and on the cycle goes.

We have already seen how inadequately trained paramilitary forces such as ICE and CBP react to civil unrest and disobedience. The risk of another violent, deadly encounter is high. Given these circumstances, we must be prepared for civil unrest and, as Dr. King understood, we must not back down. From that principled line we cannot retreat, even—indeed, especially—if the response from the regime is more violence.

We can take solace in a pattern that earlier U.S. resistance movements could not count on in their adversaries: When faced with unwavering defiance, backed by the weight of public opinion, Trump Always Chickens Out. He would rather lose, and somehow insist he won anyway, or blame someone else entirely (coughs, other Republicans). His instinct is to survive politically to fight another day, rather than put it all on the line for his party in an election where he’s not even on the ballot.

If unrest reaches a boiling point, history suggests a TACO moment may follow. But just as we witnessed and endured with Jan. 6, the damage to our democracy and the rule of law before Trump finally backs down could be considerable.

12:00 PM

Polling: Americans Uncertain On RFK Jr.’s Vaccine Stance, Very Certain That They Hate Him [Techdirt]

In my many, many posts about RFK Jr. and his disastrous tenure as Secretary of HHS, there are two themes that have hopefully broken through all the noise.

The first is that Kennedy is a miserable communicator, in a way that is totally purposeful. He talks out of both sides of his mouth all the time, such that he’s able to claim to both sides of the vaccine “debate” that he’s said what they want him to say. “Go get the MMR vaccine” he’ll say when confronted by a measles crisis that is spinning out of control. Then he’ll get in front of anti-vaxxer groups and brag about how he is changing the childhood MMR vaccine schedule, while claiming it is untested and dangerous. This leaves the public confused. It’s how you get outbreaks of once-defeated diseases.

The second is that the public generally understands that Kennedy is a problem and doesn’t like what he’s doing. We saw that trend begin in polling going back to the middle of 2025, as well as when the White House briefly flirted with understanding that Kennedy’s bullshit was becoming a massive liability for the now-approaching midterms.

Well, more recent polling demonstrates both of these things together in one poll. The public is generally confused about what Kennedy’s stance on the MMR vaccine is, but they are not at all confused about the fact that they hate him. Let’s start with the MMR vaccine.

Americans’ uncertainty of where Kennedy stands on the MMR vaccine might in large part be traced back to Kennedy himself. He has rarely provided unflinching support for the highly effective vaccine.

More than 1,900 adults responded to the poll, conducted from August 4 to 17. Of all participants, 31% correctly stated that Kennedy recommends the MMR vaccine, up from 23% in August 2025. But most indicated that Kennedy either doesn’t recommend the vaccine (29%) or are unclear about his position (40%).

I will quibble slightly with the wording in the post, specifically the word “correctly.” This is putting way, way too much weight on Kennedy’s statements that people should in fact get the vaccine. While he’s done that, I’ve already described how Kennedy talks out of both sides of his mouth on the subject. Kennedy has spent his entire career claiming that vaccines are dangerous in part because they aren’t tested. He’s made other claims about the ingredients in the MMR vaccine being deadly or causing other afflictions like autism, even long after those ingredients were removed. To view his statement that he wants people to get a vaccine that he claims is dangerous and untested as though it came with a wink and a pair of crossed-fingers isn’t in any way unreasonable. To claim the only correct answer to the polling question is that Kennedy recommends the MMR vaccine is simplifying things in the extreme.

Later in the post, CIDRAP even acknowledges much of this when talking about the current measles outbreak.

On August 2, after years of unproven claims about the MMR vaccine and an assertion that childhood vaccines cause autism, Kennedy denied responsibility for the measles outbreaks. “I’ve never questioned the efficacy of the MMR vaccine,” he said on CNN. “A measles vaccine is effective. It stops measles in about 97% of the cases.”

But the overall point here is that Kennedy’s purposeful waffling is the direct cause of a public that is confused on what Kennedy actually wants them to do to combat the measles outbreak and plays a huge part in the outbreak existing to begin with. This resurgence absolutely is his fault. It’s his life’s work, in fact.

And the public appears to be very aware of that in his favorability polling and the negative side of the respondents is getting more extreme.

A total of 23% of respondents said that their opinion of Kennedy is favorable, unchanged from August 2025. Half report an unfavorable view of him, with 42% saying they see him very unfavorably and 8% somewhat unfavorably. While the public’s overall unfavorable rating of Kennedy has not changed since August 2025, significantly more participants said their opinion is very unfavorable in 2026 than in 2025 (42% vs 37%).

That the White House hitched its wagon to this absolute turd of a cabinet secretary is strategic political suicide. It makes no sense. Trump could raise his favorability ratings full points almost immediately by firing this clown and committing to actually sound healthcare policy. That may sound like a small thing overall, but in the current climate of political inertia, it really isn’t.

I can’t explain why Kennedy has such as grip on Trump. I don’t know why it is that the White House is so enamored with this kind of political weight as it swims towards a midterm election that sure looks like it’s going to be a GOP ass-kicking.

But I do know we’re all worse off for it.

09:00 AM

US Postal Service To Start Exploring Its Always-On Surveillance Options [Techdirt]

Here comes the latest in ho-hum dystopia. And by that, I mean surveillance creep has become such a regular occurrence that it takes something truly Overton Window-breaking to gain traction with the general public.

But that’s no reason to let this slide by without pointing it out. The government (at all levels) has a lot of vehicles. People in the government (at all levels) are now asking with increasing frequency, “why not put a camera on it?”

That’s why we’ve got city sanitation vehicles wielding cameras for the purpose of generating “blight” citations. And that’s why we now have the Postal Service do a trial run with always-on cameras attached to delivery vehicles. Joseph Cox has the details at 404 Media:

The United States Postal Service is running a pilot program to put cameras in its mail carrier trucks that continuously scan roads and signs, map roadways and sidewalks, and improve “community safety,” according to a letter posted by a labor union and a statement from the agency to 404 Media. The idea is that, since the trucks are constantly traveling anyway, they can be used as a way to collect data, eventually potentially across the nation.

“The purpose of this pilot is to leverage the Postal Service’s unique ability to collect this valuable data due to the scale and frequency with which our fleet of postal vehicles travel the streets of every community across the country,” the letter, posted by NALC Branch 238 to Facebook, reads.

I always love it when the people laying the groundwork for a persistent, abusable surveillance network say things like “leveraging unique [collection] abilities.” For the most part, I think we we’re all fine with the USPS mainly being in the delivery business, with collection limited to getting the stuff that needs to go to somewhere else.

It all seems pretty innocuous, at least at first. And, to be sure, there’s a use case for what the USPS says it intends to do with the cameras:

A spokesperson for the USPS told 404 Media in an email “The Postal Service is conducting a limited pilot to assess whether vehicle-mounted cameras can help identify roadway conditions and support community safety. The pilot includes privacy safeguards and requires no additional action from employees. Findings will inform any future decisions.”

But that’s what everyone says when they want to add cameras to places and things that didn’t have them before: mumble mumble “community safety” and maybe something vague about privacy. Pervasive surveillance rarely rolls out fully developed. It develops incrementally. But the most important thing is to get the ball rolling and wait for mission creep to set in. If this hangs around long enough, it just becomes another set of cameras and recordings other agencies with less respect for “privacy safeguards” and even less interest in “supporting community safety” can access and, eventually, abuse.

08:00 AM

Ctrl-Alt-Speech: Like Herding Chats [Techdirt]

Ctrl-Alt-Speech is a weekly podcast about the latest news in online speech, from Mike Masnick and Everything in Moderation‘s Ben Whitelaw.

Subscribe now on Apple Podcasts, Overcast, Spotify, Pocket Casts, YouTube, or your podcast app of choice — or go straight to the RSS feed. To get extended episodes with additional coverage, support us on Patreon.

In this week’s episode, Mike and Ben cover:

And in the extended episode for Patreon supporters, they cover:

Our fun links this week include the Job Trail game and Mike Tomlin’s Minecraft City.

Follow us on Instagram, YouTube, and Bluesky for video clips from this week’s episode!

If you’re already a Patreon supporter, you can get the extended episode on Patreon.

07:00 AM

Pluralistic: Thwarted (09 Oct 2026) [Pluralistic: Daily links from Cory Doctorow]

->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->-> Top Sources: None -->

Today's links

  • Thwarted: Behold the awesome destructive power of a fully operational billionaire.
  • Hey look at this: Delights to delectate.
  • Object permanence: Anthrax v National Inquirer; Grey goo v Second Life; Predictive policing v actual crime; Spooky cookies; California v algorithmic price-fixing; Tivo self-destructs; Disney exec endorses piracy; TSA v geologists; Handheld printer; Mandatory DRM for all Canadian music sales; Iceweasel; "Snuff"; "Shade the Changing Girl"; Latam surveillance; Scotland Yard brands encryption terrorism; RBS slaughtered 10k small businesses to seize and sell their assets; Dead Letters.
  • Upcoming appearances: Calgary, Winnipeg, Paris, Vancouver, Victoria, Ottawa, Kilkenny, Sheffield, Oxford, Montreal.
  • Recent appearances: Where I've been.
  • Latest books: You keep readin' em, I'll keep writin' 'em.
  • Upcoming books: Like I said, I'll keep writin' 'em.
  • Colophon: All the rest.



The Warner Brother tower posed against a vintage map of Burbank, keeling over, tearing up a huge clot of sod and concrete. Standing atop of the tower, forcing it down, is a sad, spavined donkey in Democratic Party livery. Being crushed under the tower is the California flag bear, with blood pouring out of its eye and mouth.

Thwarted (permalink)

There are many ways in which every billionaire is a policy failure, but the most corrosive and destructive way in which billionaires are policy failures is this: billionaires, despite being unelected and unaccountable, possess the power to control – and ruin – millions of peoples' lives.

Despite what the Prosperity Gospel and the Efficient Market Hypothesis would have you believe, having billions of dollars is in no way a reliable predictor that you also possess the wisdom to unilaterally dictate how thousands or millions of other people must live their lives, and that dictatorial power is most the tangible effect of being a billionaire.

Billionaireism is many things, but above all else, it is the power to do whatever *you* want to do, at the expense of whatever *other* people want to do. To be a billionaire is to live a life unthwarted, above the power of your workers, your neighbors, or your government and its laws. It is the right to get high on your own supply. It is the right to live a life in which no one ever calls you on your bullshit.

Billionaires aspire to live a one-sided libertarian fantasy in which they have the unlimited right to do whatever they want, and *you* have the right to do whatever they tell you to do.

There has always been a group of people who refused to acknowledge that other people have perfectly valid reasons for wanting to pursue their own goals rather than theirs. We call most of those people "toddlers" and devote sizable social effort to helping them outgrow this belief. Billionaires, on the other hand, command resources that allow *them* to devote sizable effort to getting *us* to acknowledge that *they* should be able to tell *us* what to do.

This is why billionaires love neoclassical economics, with its doctrine of "revealed preferences," which holds that the only true way to understand someone's preferences is to ignore what they *say* and only pay attention to what they *do*. It's a belief that can only be adopted by people who suffer the self-inflicted neurological injury you get from doing an economics degree, which renders the victim incapable of perceiving or reasoning about power. To believe in "revealed preferences" is to observe someone who has sold their kidney to pay the rent and marvel at this person who has a revealed preference for only having one kidney:

https://pluralistic.net/2026/03/30/players-of-games/#know-when-to-fold-em

"Revealed preferences" is the economist's version of the bully who grabs your arm and starts whacking you with your own hand while shouting, "stop hitting yourself!" The ideological purpose that "revealed preferences" fills is letting billionaires live a life unthwarted. It's a life where they thwart everyone else, but still claim to be believers in "freedom."

This is what Peter Thiel meant when he wrote that "democracy is incompatible with freedom." In a democracy, the people who you exercise coercive power over are able to band together to create public institutions that act as a check on your power. For Thiel to maximize his freedom (to do things like spying on us and crushing our journalistic outlets), he must prevent all of *us* from voting, lest we vote to take away those cherished freedoms of his:

https://www.cato-unbound.org/2009/04/13/peter-thiel/education-libertarian/

We're told that as mere mortals, we must inevitably submit to "death and taxes." Billionaires have long since so corrupted our political system that they need not pay taxes:

https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/S/bo256019296.html

They have (practically speaking) infinite wealth, which means that they have practically infinite power, including the power to block any democratic attempt to limit their wealth (and thus their power):

https://www.hamiltonnolan.com/p/the-war-against-accumulated-capital

Having vanquished taxes, the ultra-rich are now committed to defeating death as well, making themselves easy marks for the world's weirdest cult leaders and grifters, who promise them a mix of physical and digital immortality:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0oVSnaINJ30

The fact that billionaires are such suckers, so often, is the strongest argument against billionaireism. Billionaires aren't just powerful, they're also *fallible*. We're *all* fallible, of course, but only billionaires get to impose their foolish ideas on so many other people, who have no say in the matter.

Henry Ford thought that he was so rich that he could build Brazilian worker housing whose windows faced the same direction as the worker housing he'd built in Dearborn, Michigan. He literally thought that being rich meant that he could ignore the entire concept of *the Earth's axial tilt* (he was wrong):

https://memex.craphound.com/2010/06/02/fordlandia-novelistic-history-of-henry-fords-doomed-midwestern-town-in-the-amazon-jungle/

Of course that was the least of Ford's follies. Ford also believed in a secret Jewish conspiracy to control humanity:

https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/features/henryford-antisemitism/

And despite the fact that Ford was so often demonstrably as thick as pigshit, no one was able to stop him from hiring soldiers to literally slaughter anyone who tried to limit his ability to tell other people how to live their lives:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_the_Overpass

Ford is no exception. Elon Musk believes in the same racist garbage as Henry Ford…but he also believes that if you're rich enough, you can simply wish away *geometry* and *physics*:

https://pluralistic.net/2025/07/24/geometry-hates-cars/#dogshit-unit-economics

More than anyone else, Musk illustrates the way that being insulated from people who can thwart you leads to absolute ruination. Every terrible idea Musk has, he gets to act on. This has all kinds of negative impacts, including the very real possibility that some day your house will be crushed by his flaming rocketry debris:

https://www.vice.com/en/article/texas-residents-are-suing-spacex-over-terrestrial-bombardment/

That's small potatoes, though: Musk's wrong ideas, combined with his billionaire's impunity, also allowed him to murder hundreds of thousands of the world's poorest children:

https://hsph.harvard.edu/news/usaid-shutdown-has-led-to-hundreds-of-thousands-of-deaths/

Billionaireism is fractally terrible. By definition, the kind of person who will inflict the kinds of harms needed to amass billions of dollars in pursuit of total impunity is someone who will use that impunity to hurt even more people. Anyone who fails to outgrow a toddler's insistence on subordinating others to their will *should not be allowed to subordinate anyone to their will*.

Billionaire dilettantes aren't like regular dilettantes. Anyone can be a crank, but billionaire cranks have the force-multiplier of money and the impunity it brings. These allow a billionaire to turn his crackpot ideas into an unstoppable force that crushes public education:

https://pluralistic.net/2026/03/09/autocrats-of-trade-2/#witness-the-firepower-of-this-fully-armed-and-operational-battle-station

It also lets billionaires (including the billionaire ruining public education) kidnap and rape more than a thousand girls on a private island:

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/what-to-know-about-bill-gates-relationship-with-jeffrey-epstein-as-he-is-interviewed-in-house-probe

Whatever crank whim a rich person has, we all have to live with. Take Barre Seid: the 94 year old billionaire made his fortune manufacturing electronics, and then donated $1.6b to fund "attack philanthropy" in order to undermine belief in climate change and prevent any action from being taken to avert it:

https://www.propublica.org/article/barre-seid-heartland-institute-hillsdale-college-gmu

Seid is one of the main reasons we're experiencing the super El Nino. He's not just in the top 0.1% of wealth-horders, he's also in the top 0.1% of people we can blame for the *twelve foot sea-level rise* that is currently wiping Long Beach off the map:

https://ktla.com/news/local-news/long-beach-boardwalk-collapse-rachel-surf/

Henry Ford didn't believe in the planet's axial tilt. Elon Musk doesn't believe in geometry.

Barre Seid doesn't believe in climate change. But Barre Seid *does* believe something: Barre Seid believes in *rats*.

For *three years*, Seid has paid a small army of goons to wander the area around Chicago's Lincoln Park, scattering handfuls of high-grade nuts on the ground, which have drawn flocks of pigeons and swarms of rats. Rats are everywhere. Everything is covered in pigeon shit. Seid has been repeatedly fined and cited and warned, and he's carried on turning the neighborhood into an uncontrolled vermin breeding facility:

https://gizmodo.com/a-billionaire-is-fueling-a-rat-explosion-in-a-chicago-park-in-the-stupidest-way-possible-2000823641

Whether or not the people who live, work and play in Lincoln Park want to be swarmed by rats and slip in thick slicks of pigeon shit is irrelevant. Seid can afford to pay any fine the city levies against him (a fine is a price, and he's a billionaire), which means there's no practical reason Seid has to ever stop. He has the freedom to operate unthwarted in his every desire, including his desire to carpet an entire neighborhood in feces, so everyone else lacks the freedom to live without pigeon shit and rats.

That's the thing about billionaires: as Peter Thiel wrote, democracy *is* incompatible with freedom (to be a billionaire). The fact that Barre Seid's desire to transform Lincoln Park into a pigeon-shit manure lagoon is wildly unpopular with Chicagoans is irrelevant. You can't vote Barre Seid out of office, because no one elected him Pigeon Shit Czar. He has assumed that office by right of conquest.

Our lives are full of horrible, extremely unpopular things that we can't vote away because billionaires like them. Take the decision to allow Larry Ellison and his failson to buy and kill Warner Studios. That's an incredibly unpopular idea, especially in California, where Warner, Paramount and the Ellisons are all based. Despite the fact that we all hate this idea, Ellison gets to do it, because he is unthwartable:

https://pluralistic.net/2026/09/22/happy-chudmas/#baloney-in-our-slacks

Some of California's most powerful Democrats promised to stop the merger. Instead, they signed away California's future because they decided that they weren't powerful enough to thwart a billionaire:

https://prospect.org/2026/10/08/democrats-who-let-trumps-oligarchs-buy-hollywood-warner-bros-david-ellison-gavin-newsom/

The Warnermount disaster demonstrates the fundamental flaw in libertarianism. Even if you're the kind of Musk-addled libertarian who can't open your copy of *Atlas Shrugged* anymore because the pages are all stuck together and you think the only role for the state is enforcing contracts, you *still need the state to be able to enforce those contracts*. If corporations or even individual billionaires amass more power than the state, then they can always tell the state's contract enforcers to fuck off.

The ref must be more powerful than the players on the field, so the smallest government you can have is determined by the size of the largest corporation and the wealth of the richest billionaire you're willing to tolerate.

The world is in *really* bad shape right now, but it doesn't have to be. As Mamdani has shown us, it's not that hard to run a well-administered, advanced technological civilization. Fixing potholes and making transit work and enforcing housing rules isn't rocket surgery. We know how to do those things – we just don't do them because billionaires don't want us to, and they are unthwartable:

https://yourlocalepidemiologist.substack.com/p/the-revolutionary-art-of-fixing-the

We let the most greedy, most ruthless people among us pursue their toddler's quest for an unthwarted life to the expense of any semblance of competent administration, and now we are *fucked*. That's why people are so angry about AI: there's nothing wrong with the idea of automating some tasks through advanced statistical techniques, but the reason so much of the world's scarce resources have been allocated to the AI buildout is that billionaires are infinitely horny for a technology that will let them sideline expertise in favor of money:

https://pluralistic.net/2026/10/06/nonfungible/#theory-free

After all, experts get to thwart billionaires. They can refuse to apply their expertise to a billionaire's folly. The kind of AI that the industry is pursuing today is predicated on the idea that you can just ask a computer to come up with "theory-free inferences" that will let it run a factory, drive a car, or perform medicine, without knowing *anything*, just by pulling statistical correlations out of unimaginably vast data-sets.

At some level, people get this. They understand that AI and billionaireism are intimately connected – that the reason the sector is on track to lose about a trillion dollars this year is that for billionaires, a trillion bucks is a small price to pay for an unthwartable life.


Hey look at this (permalink)

* McSWEENEY’S ISSUE 84 (ARTISAN’S TOOL ROLL) https://store.mcsweeneys.net/products/mcsweeney-s-issue-84?taxon_id=3

* Trump’s Cascade of Canceled Corporate Enforcement Against Over 200 Corporations https://www.citizen.org/article/trump-cascade-canceled-enforcement-200-corporations/

* FEAR OF MUSIC (SUPER DELUXE EDITION) https://store.talkingheadsofficial.com/collections/fear-of-music

* The Monopoly on the Open Road https://prospect.org/2026/10/07/monopoly-on-the-open-road-patrick-industries-rv/

* Paramount Stock CRUSHED After Merger with Warner Discovery Closes https://www.thebignewsletter.com/p/raises-for-me-layoffs-for-thee-the



A shelf of leatherbound history books with a gilt-stamped series title, 'The World's Famous Events.'

Object permanence (permalink)

#25yrsago National Inquirer shuts offices after anthrax delivery https://web.archive.org/web/20011221185744/https://www.etonline.com/celebrity/a6975.htm

#20yrsago Grey Goo melting online world Second Life https://web.archive.org/web/20061023190111/http://blog.secondlife.com/2006/10/08/grid-set-back-to-linden-login-only-some-goo-missed/
#20yrsago TiVo’s “self-destruct button” destructs https://web.archive.org/web/20061014132917/http://reviews.cnet.com/4531-10921_7-6650194.html

#20yrsago Disney exec: Piracy is just a business model https://www.netribution.co.uk/stories/cross-media/disney-co-chair-recognises-piracy-is-a-business-model

#20yrsago TSA confiscates geologist’s rock https://web.archive.org/web/20061019132853/https://www.courant.com/news/opinion/op_ed/hc-thorson1005.artoct05,0,777555.column?coll=hc-headlines-oped

#20yrsago Handheld printer made from a toner cartridge https://spritesmods.com/?art=inker&page=4

#20yrsago Panicked chefs propose copyrighted food https://megnut.com/2006/10/10/keep-recipes-free/

#20yrsago Canadian music proposal would *require* DRM for online tunes https://web.archive.org/web/20061022201913/https://www.jeremydebeer.ca/content/view/95/2/

#20yrsago Iceweasel, a free-as-in-speech version of Firefox https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debian–Mozilla_trademark_dispute

#15yrsago Pratchett’s Snuff: a rural/nautical tale of drawing-room gentility, racism, and justice https://memex.craphound.com/2011/10/10/pratchetts-snuff-a-rural-nautical-tale-of-drawing-room-gentility-racism-and-justice/

#10yrsago Shade the Changing Girl: amazing, gorgeous new comic about aliens and mean girls https://memex.craphound.com/2016/10/10/shade-the-changing-girl-amazing-gorgeous-new-comic-about-aliens-and-mean-girls/

#10yrsago Massive report details the surveillance powers of 12 Central and South American nations https://necessaryandproportionate.org/principles/

#10yrsago Scotland Yard charge: teaching people to use cryptography is an act of terrorism https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2016/10/cops-charge-cardiff-man-with-terrorist-crypto-training-offence/

#10yrsago RBS deliberately crushed more than 1,000 healthy UK businesses to seize and sell their assets https://www.buzzfeed.com/heidiblake/dash-for-cash?utm_term=.iq9ndLB5#.udNbypOJ

#10yrsago Though crime happens everywhere, predictive policing tools send cops to poor/black neighborhoods https://www.mic.com/articles/156286/crime-prediction-tool-pred-pol-only-amplifies-racially-biased-policing-study-shows

#10yrsago Bake: spooky chocolate chip cookies https://www.instructables.com/Creepy-Chocolate-Chip-Cookies/

#5yrsago Dead letters https://pluralistic.net/2021/10/10/dead-letters/

#1yrago A disenshittification moment from the land of mass storage https://pluralistic.net/2025/10/10/synology/#how-about-nah

#1yrago California bans algorithmic price-fixing https://pluralistic.net/2025/10/09/pricewars/#adam-smith-communist


Upcoming appearances (permalink)

A photo of me onstage, giving a speech, pounding the podium.

* Calgary: Wordfest, Oct 8
https://wordfest.com/2026/show/wordfest-presents-cory-doctorow-2026/

* Winnipeg: McNally Robinson, Oct 9
https://www.mcnallyrobinson.com/event-18991/An-Evening-with-Cory-Doctorow

* Paris: Slow Tech Summit, Oct 15
https://slowtechsummit.com/

* Vancouver: Read, Resist, Repair, Rejoice (Vancouver Writers Festival), Oct 19
https://writersfest.bc.ca/festival-event-2026/01

* Victoria: Munro's Books, Oct 20
https://www.munrobooks.com/events/6113620261020

* Vancouver: Life After AI (Vancouver Writers Festival), Oct 22
https://writersfest.bc.ca/festival-event-2026/46

* Ottawa: Life After AI (Ottawa Writers Festival), Oct 24
https://writersfestival.org/event/life-after-ai

* Kilkenny (Kilkenomics), Nov 6-8
https://kilkenomics.com/

* Vancouver: Enshittification (Sid Williams Theatre Society), Nov 10
https://www.sidwilliamstheatre.com/events/cory-doctorow-talks-enshittification/

* Vancouver: BC Policy Solutions Gala, Nov 12
https://bcpolicy.ca/gala/

* Sheffield: Reverse Centaur at Juno Books, Nov 25
https://www.outsavvy.com/event/40274/cory-doctorow-in-conversation

* Oxford: Bennett Oxford Symposium on Open Code in Science, Dec 9
https://www.bennett.ox.ac.uk/events/2026-bennett-institute-symposium/

* Montreal: World Science Fiction Convention, Sep 2-6
https://montreal2027.ca/en



A screenshot of me at my desk, doing a livecast.

Recent appearances (permalink)

* Terms of Service with Clare Duffy (CNN)
https://www.cnn.com/audio/podcasts/terms-of-service-with-clare-duffy/episodes/458ce968-af5d-11f0-b539-13ed2afe25f8

* AI, Work, and Power (Software Engineering Daily)
AI, Work, and Power https://softwareengineeringdaily.com/podcasts/cory-doctorow-on-ai-work-and-power/

* AI, Corporate Power, and the Fight for Worker Control (Plutopia)
https://plutopia.io/cory-doctorow-ai-corporate-power-and-the-fight-for-worker-control/

* How to Think About AI—Before It’s Too Late (Daniel Solove)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_0xR3uEgGcc

* Could Tech Bosses Destroy Life As We Know It? (Politics JOE)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PL4VktU0SgY



A grid of my books with Will Stahle covers..

Latest books (permalink)

* "The Reverse-Centaur's Guide to AI," a short book about being a better AI critic, Farrar, Straus and Giroux, June 2026
https://us.macmillan.com/books/9780374621568/thereversecentaursguidetolifeafterai/

* "Canny Valley": A limited edition collection of the collages I create for Pluralistic, self-published, September 2025 https://pluralistic.net/2025/09/04/illustrious/#chairman-bruce

* "Enshittification: Why Everything Suddenly Got Worse and What to Do About It," Farrar, Straus, Giroux, October 7 2025
https://us.macmillan.com/books/9780374619329/enshittification/

* "Picks and Shovels": a sequel to "Red Team Blues," about the heroic era of the PC, Tor Books (US), Head of Zeus (UK), February 2025 (https://us.macmillan.com/books/9781250865908/picksandshovels).

* "The Bezzle": a sequel to "Red Team Blues," about prison-tech and other grifts, Tor Books (US), Head of Zeus (UK), February 2024 (thebezzle.org).

* "The Lost Cause:" a solarpunk novel of hope in the climate emergency, Tor Books (US), Head of Zeus (UK), November 2023 (http://lost-cause.org).

* "The Internet Con": A nonfiction book about interoperability and Big Tech (Verso) September 2023 (http://seizethemeansofcomputation.org). Signed copies at Book Soup (https://www.booksoup.com/book/9781804291245).

* "Red Team Blues": "A grabby, compulsive thriller that will leave you knowing more about how the world works than you did before." Tor Books http://redteamblues.com.

* "Chokepoint Capitalism: How to Beat Big Tech, Tame Big Content, and Get Artists Paid, with Rebecca Giblin", on how to unrig the markets for creative labor, Beacon Press/Scribe 2022 https://chokepointcapitalism.com



A cardboard book box with the Macmillan logo.

Upcoming books (permalink)

* "The Post-American Internet," a geopolitical sequel of sorts to *Enshittification*, Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2027

* "Unauthorized Bread": a middle-grades graphic novel adapted from my novella about refugees, toasters and DRM, FirstSecond, April 20, 2027

* "Enshittification, Why Everything Suddenly Got Worse and What to Do About It" (the graphic novel), Firstsecond, 2027

* "The Memex Method," Farrar, Straus, Giroux, 2027



Colophon (permalink)

Today's top sources:

Currently writing:

* “Once Is Enemy Action,” a science fiction novel about the origins of modern technofascism. Today's words: 537 (23966 total).

* "The Post-American Internet," a sequel to "Enshittification," about the better world the rest of us get to have now that Trump has torched America. Fourth draft completed. Submitted to editor.

* A Little Brother short story about DIY insulin PLANNING


This work – excluding any serialized fiction – is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license. That means you can use it any way you like, including commercially, provided that you attribute it to me, Cory Doctorow, and include a link to pluralistic.net.

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Quotations and images are not included in this license; they are included either under a limitation or exception to copyright, or on the basis of a separate license. Please exercise caution.


How to get Pluralistic:

Blog (no ads, tracking, or data-collection):

Pluralistic.net

Newsletter (no ads, tracking, or data-collection):

https://pluralistic.net/plura-list

Mastodon (no ads, tracking, or data-collection):

https://mamot.fr/@pluralistic

Bluesky (no ads, possible tracking and data-collection):

https://bsky.app/profile/doctorow.pluralistic.net

Medium (no ads, paywalled):

https://doctorow.medium.com/

Tumblr (mass-scale, unrestricted, third-party surveillance and advertising):

https://mostlysignssomeportents.tumblr.com/tagged/pluralistic

"When life gives you SARS, you make sarsaparilla" -Joey "Accordion Guy" DeVilla

READ CAREFULLY: By reading this, you agree, on behalf of your employer, to release me from all obligations and waivers arising from any and all NON-NEGOTIATED agreements, licenses, terms-of-service, shrinkwrap, clickwrap, browsewrap, confidentiality, non-disclosure, non-compete and acceptable use policies ("BOGUS AGREEMENTS") that I have entered into with your employer, its partners, licensors, agents and assigns, in perpetuity, without prejudice to my ongoing rights and privileges. You further represent that you have the authority to release me from any BOGUS AGREEMENTS on behalf of your employer.

ISSN: 3066-764X

06:00 AM

Parental Leave Problems: Part 1 – What Happens If You’re Not Covered by Shakai Hoken? [General Union]

Having the right to take maternity leave does not necessarily mean you will have an income while you are away from work.
One of the most important sources of financial support during maternity leave is Maternity Allowance (出産手当金), which is available through employees’ health insurance for workers who meet the requirements. Workers enrolled only in National Health Insurance generally do not receive the same benefit.

That means two workers with very similar jobs can find themselves in very different financial situations when they become pregnant, depending on their insurance coverage.

Shakai hoken eligibility can also be complicated. Working hours, wages, the size and status of the employer, and other factors may affect whether enrollment is required. And even when an employer is technically complying with the law, gaps in the system can still leave workers without the support they expected when they need it most.

That’s why it’s worth checking your insurance coverage before you need maternity or childcare leave. Don’t wait until your leave is about to begin to find out what benefits you will—or won’t—receive.

If you’re unsure whether you should be enrolled in shakai hoken or what benefits you may be entitled to, contact the General Union for a consultation.

Maternity and Childcare Leave: Protected Doesn’t Always Mean Paid

Kanji of the Day: 将 [Kanji of the Day]

将

✍10

小6

leader, commander, general, admiral, or, and again, soon, from now on, just about

ショウ ソウ

まさ.に はた まさ ひきい.る もって

主将   (しゅしょう)   —   commander-in-chief
将来   (しょうらい)   —   future
将棋   (しょうぎ)   —   shogi
武将   (ぶしょう)   —   military commander
王将   (おうしょう)   —   king (of the senior player)
将軍   (しょうぐん)   —   general
将に   (まさに)   —   just (about to)
近い将来   (ちかいしょうらい)   —   near future
大将   (たいしょう)   —   general
女将   (おかみ)   —   proprietress (of a traditional Japanese inn, restaurant, or shop)

Generated with kanjioftheday by Douglas Perkins.

Kanji of the Day: 韓 [Kanji of the Day]

韓

✍18

中学

Korea

カン

から いげた

韓国   (からくに)   —   China
日韓   (にっかん)   —   Japan and South Korea
韓国人   (かんこくじん)   —   South Korean person
米韓   (べいかん)   —   United States and South Korea
韓国語   (かんこくご)   —   Korean (language)
日中韓   (にっちゅうかん)   —   China, Japan and Korea
韓流   (かんりゅう)   —   hallyu
中韓   (ちゅうかん)   —   China and Korea
訪韓   (ほうかん)   —   visit to South Korea
在韓米軍   (ざいかんべいぐん)   —   US troops stationed in South Korea

Generated with kanjioftheday by Douglas Perkins.

04:00 AM

Alabama’s TikTok Settlement Comes With An Affiliate Program For Getting Other AGs To Go After TikTok [Techdirt]

The big Meta multi-state settlement got most of the headlines, and there’s been plenty of discussion about how it’s a bad deal for kids and pretty clearly anti-competitive. That’s thanks to a very strange clause that encourages Meta to make its own required feature changes the “industry standard” by convincing other platforms to cut similar deals with state AGs. So far, YouTube has said it won’t accept Meta’s terms, because they don’t make sense for its very different platform. TikTok hasn’t publicly commented on the Meta deal, though it did reject Meta’s attempt to run ads on TikTok itself urging TikTok to join the settlement.

It didn’t get nearly as much attention, but TikTok did somewhat quietly settle with one state: Alabama. They came to a $100 million settlement in a case that Alabama brought last year, claiming that the features of TikTok were “addictive.” The settlement came out on a Friday, just before the first such trial was set to begin against TikTok the following Monday. Given how we’ve seen juries more than willing to blame social media platforms for anything bad that happens to kids using the platform, it’s clear that TikTok was under the gun to work out a settlement that avoided an expensive trial and possibly more expensive verdict.

On Friday, Alabama announced that TikTok had agreed to safety measures including a two-hour daily limit for underage users and additional parental controls to further limit time on the site. The settlement also restricts unlimited scrolling and overnight access, as well as the use of beauty filters and other features that social media experts have said are harmful to teenagers’ mental health.

Most of those sound pretty similar to Meta’s settlement. But there are some key differences in the full settlement agreement. And the biggest, as first pointed out by Stanford’s Daphne Keller, is that whereas the Meta settlement encouraged Meta to convince TikTok and YouTube (and possibly Snap) to sign similar deals and to pay similar amounts, the TikTok settlement… appears to encourage Alabama to convince other Attorneys General to go after TikTok.

It’s… weird.

The agreement sets up multiple “funds” that are wholly dependent on other state AGs coming to similar settlements. The headline $100 million number is “fund 1.” The $100 million is supposed to go towards compensating people “harmed” by TikTok, but it appears that the Alabama Attorney General gets to decide how that works, and based on past settlements in other cases, I’m going to assume there won’t be much transparency there. Then there’s another $16.2 million going to outside lawyers and litigation costs:

Fund 1 is paid to resolve the State’s claims under the Alabama Deceptive Trade Practices Act (Ala. Code § 8-19-1 et seq.). $14,200,000.00 is allocated to attorneys’ fees and $2,000,000.00 is allocated to litigation expenses associated with this action (to be paid to outside counsel directly). The remaining $100,000,000.00 of Fund 1 is designated as compensatory restitution and remediation for the benefit of Alabama consumers within the meaning of Section 162(f)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code and shall be paid to the Office of the Alabama Attorney General to be used in the Attorney General’s sole discretion for any lawful purpose, including compensatory restitution and remediation for the benefit of Alabama consumers.

“Sole discretion for any lawful purpose.” In other words, the AG’s office can spend it however it wants, and there’s no requirement that a dime reach anyone “harmed” by TikTok. Indeed, the chief counsel in the case has more or less admitted that the Alabama has no intention of actually using the money to help kids at all:

Chief Counsel Katherine Robertson, who oversees the case for the Attorney General’s Office, said the money will likely land in the state’s general fund, though her office wants lawmakers to steer it toward Alabama youth.

“It will probably go to the general fund, but we hope to have discussions with our legislative leadership about using this to really remediate the harm that’s been done to our youth here in Alabama,” Robertson said.

But then it gets really bizarre. There’s a second fund, Fund 2, that TikTok agrees to pay, up to an additional $183.8 million, depending on if and when certain “tiers” of other AGs convince TikTok to settle:

Fund 2 Contingent Payment Pool & Sequential Tiered Vesting

(a) Total Contingent Amount: In addition to Fund 1, Defendants shall establish a contingent payment allocation pool of $183,800,000.00 (“Fund 2” or “Contingent Amount”).

(b) Vesting Tiers and Sequential Timeframes: Fund 2 shall vest incrementally across four (4) distinct tiers based upon state participation in qualifying agreements (including any consent judgment and settlement agreements) or Assurances of Voluntary Compliance (“AVCs”)

(i) Tier 1 (30% / $55,140,000.00): Vests when ten (10) State Attorneys General execute qualifying agreements, provided the tenth (10th) agreement is executed within twenty-four (24) months following the Effective Date (“Tier 1 Window”).

(ii) Tier 2 (30%/$55,140,000.00): Vests when twenty (20) State Attorneys General execute qualifying agreements, provided the twentieth (20th) agreement is executed within twenty-four (24) months following the Tier 1 Vesting Date (“Tier 2 Window”).

(iii) Tier 3 (20%/$36,760,000.00): Vests when thirty (30) State Attorneys General execute qualifying agreements, provided the thirtieth (30th) agreement is executed within twenty-four (24) months following the Tier 2 Vesting Date (“Tier 3 Window”).

(iv) Tier 4 (20%/$36,760,000.00): Vests when forty (40) State Attorneys General execute qualifying agreements, provided the fortieth (40th) agreement is executed within twenty-four (24) months following the Tier 3 Vesting Date (“Tier 4 Window”).

I can’t recall ever seeing anything even remotely like this. As regular Techdirt commenter John Roddy noted, TikTok and the Alabama AG here basically created an affiliate program for settlement enforcement. I honestly can’t even wrap my head around the logic here. “Here, we’ve agreed to pay you a ton of money to settle this case… and if we agree to pay more money to other states, you also get a cut for being first in line.”

Think about the incentive structure here: Alabama’s AG now has a direct financial stake in recruiting 39 other states to pressure TikTok into the same deal, on a deadline. I can’t see how anything good comes of that.

And, just as with the Meta settlement, this appears to be painfully unconstitutional. The settlement requires the suppression of clearly constitutionally protected speech at gunpoint. “Agree to suppress this content we don’t like or we will make you suffer through a painful trial, and possibly an even more painful verdict.”

The Meta settlement was concerning enough on its own, but now this model of AGs extracting speech restrictions through settlements is becoming a template, and it’s picking up weird gamified bounty structures along the way. The state AGs may get their headlines and their billions, but the real losers are everyone who uses social media and the First Amendment.

Daily Deal: The Essential MATLAB & LabVIEW Mega Bundle [Techdirt]

The Essential MATLAB and LabVIEW Mega Bundle has 9 courses to help you improve your skills in programming and visualization. You’ll learn the basics of each and then go through hands-on courses building apps, learning about data analysis and visualization, and more. It’s on sale for $30.

Note: The Techdirt Deals Store is powered and curated by StackSocial. A portion of all sales from Techdirt Deals helps support Techdirt. The products featured do not reflect endorsements by our editorial team.

03:00 AM

Hey Platforms: Your Violent Content Policies Are About To Meet The Pentagon’s Firing Squad [Techdirt]

There is plenty of coverage everywhere you look about how Pete Hegseth and the Pentagon have announced plans to livestream the firing squad execution of Nidal Hasan, the Army officer who shot up Fort Hood, killing 13 people and wounding dozens more. There is plenty of debate about the moral atrocity that is a firing squad execution and plenty of comparison to the botched lethal injection execution in Tennessee last week. This is not the place for such discussions, other than to make it clear that the entire concept here — no matter how terrible Hasan is or no matter how terrible his crime — of the state putting people to death is a barbaric practice that should be ended.

But there is one angle here that we can talk about that most other places won’t: whether hosting the livestream would violate the platforms’ own rules — and whether they’ll simply ignore (or rewrite) those rules to do it anyway. While it’s probably perfectly legal in the US to stream the execution, it still might violate the various platform rules that most sites have set up for themselves. (Hosting it globally may also create legal headaches in countries with stricter rules on violent, extremist, and terrorist content, but that’s a separate question.)

But let’s look more closely at the possible platforms Hegseth might use, since the Pentagon hasn’t yet said where this “livestream” is supposed to occur.

X

Elon Musk’s X is (duh) a likely choice. In theory, X has a “violent content policy,” but it leaves a lot of wiggle room for Elon to claim the barbarous execution doesn’t violate its policies:

You may share graphic media if it is properly labeled, not prominently displayed and is not excessively gory or depicting sexual violence, but explicitly threatening, inciting, glorifying, or expressing desire for violence is not allowed.

X is a place where people can express themselves, show and learn about what’s happening, and debate global issues, often sharing images and videos as part of the conversation. However, healthy conversations can’t thrive when Violent Speech is used to deliver a message, and not every participant wishes to be exposed to Violent Media. As a result, we may remove or reduce the visibility of Violent Content to ensure the safety of our users and prevent the normalization or glorification of violent actions. We also do not allow sharing Violent Content in highly visible places such as profile photos, banners or bio.

I would argue that livestreaming a government firing squad is “excessively gory” and, depending on how it’s packaged, “glorifying” violence, though there’s clearly room to argue otherwise. And I’m sure Elon will claim it’s not. The policy does do a little more of an explanation of what it considers “glorification” as well:

  • Glorification of Violence: Glorifying, praising, or celebrating acts of violence where harm occurred, including expressing gratitude or praising that someone experienced physical harm by Violent Entities. This also includes glorifying animal abuse or cruelty.

Again, I would argue the execution counts, because it is clearly celebrating an act of violence. The policy also says that it prohibits violent content “in live video” but again, I expect that to be ignored by Elon’s team.

There is one concrete area of X’s policy that is interesting:

  • Moment of Death: We may request the removal of images or videos that were taken at the point of, immediately before, or after an identifiable individual’s death, if we receive a request from their family or an authorized representative.

In theory, Hasan’s family could ask X to remove the video, and then the question is whether Elon would honor that request. And since the policy only says X “may” remove such content, it leaves plenty of wiggle room to say no.

In short, the video will likely be shared on X, and whether or not it violates the company’s policies really depends on a very subjective set of decisions.

YouTube

YouTube is the other most likely choice for streaming the execution. Here, it seems pretty clear that the execution video, on its own, would violate YouTube’s stated policy.

Violent or gory content intended to shock or disgust viewers, or content encouraging others to commit violent acts, are not allowed on YouTube.

That said, YouTube leaves itself an out in saying there’s an exception for “content that is in the public interest.”

In some cases, we may make exceptions for content with educational, documentary, scientific, or artistic context, including content that is in the public’s interest.

Looking through that linked exceptions page, the obvious hook is that YouTube lists “government proceedings” as public-interest material that may get an exception, and you can bet that’s what it would point to. But the same page lists content that’s barred from exceptions no matter the context, including “the act of decapitation.” While this isn’t quite decapitation, it’s still a pretty gruesome public execution.

Meta (Instagram / Facebook)

Zuck has spent the past couple years sucking up to Donald Trump after Trump threatened to put Zuck in jail for life. But Meta’s “Violent and Graphic Content” policy is the clearest of the bunch in ruling out hosting a livestream of the execution. In the list of things that it says “Do not post” is literally:

Live-streams of capital punishments.

The policy does allow still imagery of such content behind a warning screen and limited to adults, but livestreams of capital punishment are banned outright.

I don’t see any exceptions or language that Meta can wiggle out of for this, meaning that if it does allow such a livestream, it would only be either by ignoring its current policies or changing them.

TikTok

TikTok has less detail than the others in its policy, but does say they don’t allow “glorification of violence” among other things.

  • Violent and Criminal Behavior: We don’t allow threats, encouragement or glorification of violence, promotion of crime, or instructions on how to commit harmful acts.

Again, the company (now backed by Trump’s investor friends) can probably wriggle around that language and try to claim that the execution isn’t a “glorification” of violence, though it would be wrong.

Truth Social

I guess we need to consider that the Pentagon might try to post it on the president’s personal social media and propaganda site, Truth Social. Truth Social has very unhelpful terms of service and community guidelines, that do say that when you upload content you “represent and warrant” that your content isn’t violent:

your Contributions are not obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, violent, harassing, libelous, slanderous, or otherwise objectionable.

your Contributions do not depict violence, threats of violence or criminal activity.

But that is only the agreement with the user. It says nothing about whether or not the site will take such content down. In the community guidelines, it only notes that you can “report” “content that depicts violence or threat of violence,” but says nothing about whether or not that’s actually allowed.

In short, depending on how much these services want to bend over backwards (or should I say, bow down?) to appease Donald Trump and the bloodthirsty Pete Hegseth, all of them except Meta can make unfortunately credible claims that livestreaming an execution by firing squad doesn’t technically violate their policies. Meta cannot say that. I’d argue that the videos likely do violate YouTube, X, and TikTok’s policies as well, but it very much depends on subjective calls for all three.

Again, as a reminder, in the US, all of these platforms are free to set their own editorial policies, including both what to allow and what not to allow.

Remember, some of the earliest moral panic over how “bad” social media is came from US elected officials losing their minds about terrorist execution videos on YouTube. It’s kind of incredible how far we’ve come: Now the US government itself is planning to stream a gruesome execution of its own, and any platform that pushes back will likely be attacked by the president and his supporters for not being patriotic enough.

02:00 AM

A statement on the Tor Project's relationship with Mullvad [Tor Project blog]

Recent concerns about a political donation by a Mullvad co-founder have raised questions about the Tor Project's funding relationship with the company. We are not terminating the relationship but are setting clear boundaries on our relationship with Mullvad.

Members of the Tor community have asked us to explain how continued collaboration with Mullvad fits with the Tor Project's human rights mission. We have heard both calls to end the relationship and concerns about what that would mean for Tor's work and the communities affected. We want to explain our decision to continue our technical collaboration with Mullvad and acknowledge the difficult trade-offs behind it. Our decision followed a thorough due diligence process that involved extensive discussions with community members, staff, and the board, a staff survey, and detailed financial analysis and scenario planning.

The Tor Project’s mission is to advance human rights and freedoms. We build privacy and anti-censorship tools that people use to protect themselves from repression and surveillance, and express themselves freely. We will continue this work alongside communities whose rights are under threat.

While Tor defends free speech, not all speech is equally compatible with our mission. We strongly oppose rhetoric that threatens other human rights and freedoms.

The work to promote and preserve the human right to privacy, free speech, and free access to information online is severely under-resourced. This work requires and benefits from collaboration across organizations. Sometimes that work requires making difficult compromises to advance specific goals we know will benefit our communities in the long run.

We are continuing our technical collaboration with Mullvad to sustain work that Tor users and contributors depend on. This collaboration has helped improve the structure, maintainability, and auditability of Tor Browser’s codebase, expanded feedback from users beyond Tor Browser’s core audience, and created a lower-risk environment to test features that may later benefit Tor Browser users. It also gives more people access to online privacy through an additional free, open-source tool that serves different user needs. We recognize that the potential benefits to Mullvad of such a collaboration are difficult for some in our community to accept. Our responsibility is to ensure that this collaboration does not compromise our mission or the Tor Project's independence.

Tor Project has paused proactive co-branding with Mullvad. That pause applies to joint promotional activity while the technical collaboration continues in alignment with our narrowly scoped agreement. We have also reviewed how Mullvad Browser is described and endorsed on our owned channels, and clarified language suggesting broader alignment between our values. These changes are intended to describe the relationship more accurately and avoid notions of implied endorsement.

We know this decision will not satisfy everyone. Continuing the collaboration carries a cost to trust for some in our community, and we take that seriously. We are grateful to the members of our community who have raised concerns, asked hard questions, and reminded us what is at stake. Those concerns are shaping our path forward. Tor’s mission has always required both principle and pragmatism. We will continue to defend privacy, anonymity, freedom of expression, and access to information while making clear that our collaborations must serve, and never obscure, our human rights commitments.

01:00 AM

Thin friction and thicker walls [Seth Godin's Blog on marketing, tribes and respect]

Civilized culture is based on a thin sort of friction. You don’t yell at the library, act boorish at a restaurant or hassle a minor celebrity at the supermarket. It’s just not done.

The result of these human layers and inferences are cues and norms that add up to a connected, generative society.

Add selfish hustle, AI agents and cheap bots, and the thin friction is insufficient. They can multiply exponentially, care little about being shunned and have no interest in their reputation.

Fake sincerity is now cheap. Interchangeable identities subvert a generations-long tradition of owning your words and your actions.

You’ll miss the thin friction when it’s gone, replaced by taller, thicker walls. You might already be noticing it.

Interactivity and permeability to those we don’t know well were largely overlooked foundations in the creation of learning, science and culture. We figured out a scalable approach to “knock knock, who’s there” but now it’s going away.

You won’t be able to knock unless you’re invited first. Of course, the invitation will probably be filtered out.

      

12:00 AM

Pirate Streaming Portal Series.ly Has Domain Suspended, Rebrand Surfaces (Updated) [TorrentFreak]

Series.ly logoSeries.ly was once one of Spain’s best-known pirate link sites. The original operation dropped its piracy links in late 2014.

In 2021, the domain was bought at auction by a new team, which says it isn’t part of the original one.

The new Series.ly, which requires a login to access, became pretty popular on its own, with nearly two million monthly visits, and nearly 90% of its traffic coming from Spain.

That popularity didn’t go unnoticed by rightsholders, which haven’t given up on shutting it down yet. In May, film and TV producers’ group EGEDA filed a complaint with the Second Section of Spain’s Intellectual Property Commission, which falls under the Ministry of Culture, aiming to shut the site down.

The Commission’s investigator checked a sample of 42 of the 110 titles that were listed in the complaint. Of these, 35 could be streamed or downloaded from Series.ly at the time. The Commission also ordered the site to remove the infringing content in July, but it says Series.ly never responded.

From Google to a Libyan Registrar

At the end of July, the Commission sanctioned a series of anti-piracy measures against the site, targeting third-party intermediaries. For example, the resolution requires Google and Bing to remove the site from their search results, while ISPs with a market share of more than 1% must block the domain name.

The ISPs are also urged to redirect visitors to a government page. This informs users that the Commission blocked the domain “for having illegally facilitated access to content protected by intellectual property rights” (translated).

The order also lists Cloudflare and Ukrainian hosting company Virtual Systems, whose Kyiv data centers were hit by Russian missile strikes last month, as well as Series.ly’s domain registrar, Libyan Spider Network. These measures apply to the current domain name, as well as new ones that the operator may use for the same purpose.

The Commission’s order

The Commission's order

The Commission’s resolution needs court approval before it can be enforced. This came on September 28, when a judge at the Central Court of First Instance in Madrid concluded that the measures were proportionate, approving them as requested.

The Libyan Registrar Acts

Little more than a week later, at least one intermediary appears to have taken action. Earlier this week, Series.ly unexpectedly lost its domain name after the domain registrar, Libyan Spider, stepped in.

WHOIS records show that series.ly was placed on ‘clientHold’, a status set by the registrar to take a domain offline. This pulls the domain from the .ly zone, which means that Series.ly no longer resolves.

clientHold

clientHold

Libyan Spider hasn’t commented publicly, but the Series.ly operator says the notice cited the Spanish order. It reached them through the auction house that sold them the domain, which acts as a reseller for the registrar.

“The reason they gave us was a Spanish copyright resolution and a court order authorizing suspension measures against the domain,” the operator tells TorrentFreak (translated).

It is not clear whether the other intermediaries have taken action yet, but the court order remains valid.

Interestingly, soon after the Series.ly domain was suspended, a similar site with the Cinubo brand appeared online. The Series.ly Telegram and Discord were also renamed to Cinubo.

Cinubo.com

cinubo website

No Plans to Appeal

Regarding the suspension, the operator says it didn’t see the warnings before the domain was suspended. An EGEDA email it later found was sent to support@series.ly, while the address listed on the site is soporte@series.ly.

According to the operator, Series.ly is a non-profit that hasn’t generated any revenue since it launched. The site doesn’t host any video files, and the links to other services are added by the community, he explains.

“Our position is that complaints about those video files should be directed at the services that host or distribute them,” the operator says (translated).

“We think it’s disproportionate that a complaint about content hosted by third parties ends up getting our entire domain suspended, including email and the personal library features.”

For now, the operator doesn’t plan to appeal the Spanish order. The company behind the project is based in Nevis, which raises questions about the reach of the Spanish order, the operator argues.

“We question whether a procedure handled in Spain justifies suspending our domain worldwide, which also affects email and services that have nothing to do with the works in question,” the operator notes (translated).

This may not be the end of it though. The Spanish order also covers new domain names that are used for the same purpose, which could include the new Cinubo one. In addition, other intermediaries may take action as well.

—

Update October 9, 2026: A few days after it was suspended, the series.ly domain appears to be back under the control of its owner. The operator informs us that the registrar lifted the suspension, but stressed that the domain can no longer be used to link to copyright-infringing content.

Update 2: Series.ly now shows a page documenting the history of the domain. It no longer links to a streaming portal.

The new Series.ly (translated)

series.ly

—

A copy of the Commission’s resolution is available here (pdf). The court’s authorization can be found here (pdf). The Series.ly operator’s answers were provided in Spanish. The quotes in this article were translated by TorrentFreak.

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

Friday 2026-10-09

11:00 PM

Cable Giants Ironically Plan To Sue FCC For Illegally Killing Media Ownership Limits [Techdirt]

I’ve explored how Trump FCC Boss Brendan Carr has been working tirelessly to illegally destroy what’s left of already shaky U.S. media consolidation limits. He’s particularly interested in helping Trump-friendly local broadcasters like Sinclair, Tegna, and Nexstar merge and dominate what’s left of broadcast TV “news,” as a very obvious reward for their loyalty to the president.

Consumer groups, media reformers, and activists have obviously been disgusted by the efforts. But the efforts have also repeatedly pissed off other Trump-friendly companies. Right wing propaganda “news” outlet Newsmax, for example, recently complained to Carr because they feel the elimination of media consolidation rules will make their local broadcast competitors in the right wing propaganda space too powerful.

Carr’s moves have also ironically pissed of bigger cable companies, which are now saying Carr’s attempt to greenlight a monopoly over local TV broadcast news will result in the bigger, combined broadcasters extracting significantly more money from them. As such, a lobbying org representing cable giants like Comcast and Charter say they’ll soon be filing suit against the agency over the changes:

“The TV ownership rule prohibits any single broadcast station owner from reaching more than 39 percent of all TV households in the US. Congress directed the FCC to set the cap at 39 percent in 2004. On Friday, cable lobby groups submitted a petition asking the FCC to keep the TV ownership cap in place until litigation over the FCC’s authority to repeal the rule is over.”

There’s no shortage of irony that this is what passes as media policy in the U.S.

Cable giants like Comcast and Charter, which have actively (and successfully) lobbied for reduced scrutiny of their own monopolization and consolidation across broadband and TV, are now complaining that other illegal efforts at consolidation will be bad for them personally. They like it when Carr obliterates oversight of their own monopolization, but don’t much like it when the shoe is on the other foot.

This is all the embarrassing gesticulations of obvious regulatory capture and corruption.

Trump’s first FCC boss, Ajit Pai, was basically just a revolving door regulator whose interests fully lined up with industry. Brendan Carr is most certainly that — but he’s also a radical authoritarian zealot keen on censoring voices critical of his autocratic boss, and helping right wing propagandists dominate U.S. media — much to the chagrin of some other, equally terrible companies.

The cable lobby won’t be alone in suing Carr and the FCC over its attack on media consolidation limits. Media reform group Free Press is also planning to sue the agency over its effort:

“Changing this limit requires congressional action, but Carr doesn’t care,” Free Press General Counsel Matt Wood said at the time. “He’ll do whatever it takes to clear the way for Trump-aligned billionaires to swallow up stations wherever and whenever they please. The result would be just one or two dominant broadcasters in every market, deep job cuts for journalists, and an influx of bargain-basement content disguised as local news.”

Several of these bigger cable giants (like Comcast NBC Universal) have been lobbying the FCC to also eliminate rules preventing the big four major networks from merging as well. The plus side is that Comcast and Charter taking a stand against Carr policies is another indicator that big companies are starting to gain in confidence as Trump’s health and political power wanes.

In no time at all we’ll be back to ordinary corruption and regulatory capture, slightly less tainted by the unpleasant, lingering odor of autocratic extremism.

01:00 PM

Pete Hegseth Pretends Pentagon’s New ‘Religious Affairs’ Office Isn’t Christian Nationalism [Techdirt]

There’s a certain segment of the American population that likes to really bang on about the importance of the First Amendment to our rights to free speech and the freedom of religion… right up until that includes speech and religion they don’t like. This same segment also tends to make a lot of noise about how America is the freest and bestest country in the world, full of liberty and apple pie and Ford F150s, or whatever the hell else gives them a jingoistic flutter.

The reality is different, of course. Human rights in America in the modern era were never blazing any new trails, and religious liberty specifically has been on the decline for decades, particularly since the 9/11 attacks. Certain populations and sects of Christianity have enjoyed general freedom, no matter the gnashing of teeth you might hear over a fucking wedding cake or website on occasion, while many other faiths have faced all kinds of headwinds. Including, I might add, those with no faith whatsoever, who find their contributions to federal coffers routinely misused for religious purposes of which they want no part.

Such as the faith-based offices that have sprung up within federal government departments ever since George W. Bush decided that faith had a place in the American government after all. It was inevitable that charlatans like Donald Trump would use that sort of thing to his advantage, of course, but the practice was also continued under Democrats Barack Obama and Joe Biden. And now we have Pete Hegseth injecting a religious office directly into the Pentagon.

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth is launching an office of religious affairs, the latest of his faith-related reforms at the Pentagon. He announced in a speech Wednesday that the office will help offer “first-class religious support” and will report directly to him.

“Our department is, you might say, putting on the full armor of God, because while we wage physical war, we all know the real battle is spiritual,” he said.

If a chill didn’t just run down your spine, you’re not paying attention to history. There is nothing more dangerous, as Christopher Hitchens used to say, than a man with a powerful army who believes he has god on his side. To cloak the Pentagon in religiosity is a dangerous mistake so obvious that it barely needs arguing. So much so, in fact, that the Pentagon’s PR department attempted to clean this up and make it all sound more benign.

The Office of Religious Affairs, or ORA, will advocate for military chaplains and religious support “at the highest level of the Department,” according to a Pentagon statement. It will not “compel religious participation, favor one faith, or diminish the rights of personnel of any faith or lack thereof.”

Yeah, I’m going to go ahead and call bullshit on that one. Go read Hegseth’s remarks again and tell me if that doesn’t sound like someone who is going to compel participation. As for the favoring of one religion over another, or of the faithless, that’s already happened. And this office, bound by the arbitrary determinations made under Hegseth’s DoD, will be compelled to follow suit.

The Defense Department also slashed the number of religious affiliations it officially recognizes, down to 31 from more than 200 previously recognized traditions. The list no longer includes atheists, Unitarian Universalists, pagans and Wiccans.

And then add to it all that the military is currently in a bit of a crisis over mental health and suicides. Chaplains have been tasked in recent years to help guide soldiers in a therapeutic way for those suffering, but Hegseth is tired of that namby-pamby bullshit.

The memo mentions “faith-based initiatives supporting Department-wide suicide reduction.” In recent years, the military has become increasingly dependent on chaplains to help address the growing numbers of troops in mental health distress. Hegseth has said he wants chaplains to focus more on God and less on therapeutic “self-help and self-care.”

This is what happens when you let religion creep its way into secular organizations. Religion is evangelical and expansionist by its very nature. That isn’t meant to be a criticism; it just is, definitionally. The original sin, as it were, was allowing Bush to open the door just enough to get a more benign version of this established. Perhaps it was even earlier, when the Continental Congress approved the very first military chaplains, even as they fought the Revolutionary War.

The fascistic takeover of that religious infrastructure is, and always was, inevitable.

The Attacks on the Vote Are Underway. But So Is the Blue Response. [The Status Kuo]

Hero of the Republic Marc Elias, photo courtesy of Democracy Docket

On Monday, the first day California opened its ballot drop boxes for the midterms, masked ICE officers detained the parent of a student in a parking lot at Allan Hancock College in Santa Maria—even though ICE claims it has “no record of activity” there. As Democracy Docket’s Yunior Rivas reported, that lot adjoins a second lot serving as a county ballot drop-off site, and voters had to pass through the area where agents were operating in order to deposit their ballots.

That story capped a week of Democracy Docket reporting on how far federal agencies have already gone to mess with the midterm vote. Jacob Knutson reported that ICE has investigated hundreds of voter registration groups. Knutson and Rivas further reported that ICE has obtained two voter datasets totaling 99 million records. And Matt Cohen reported that election deniers Tina Peters and Cleta Mitchell are pressing the Commerce Department to put voting machines under federal regulation.

Their reporting draws significantly from the legal work of Democracy Forward. The nonprofit has forced the ICE records into public view through a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit, and it also represents voting rights groups and local governments suing to keep armed federal agents away from the polls.

Democracy Docket’s founder, Marc Elias, chairs Democracy Forward’s board. In his newsletter this morning, Elias wrote, “For months, I have been sounding the alarm that ICE will be used to suppress voters and block people from casting their ballots. These records show that, behind the scenes, it is already carrying out Trump’s orders.”

Each story is alarming on its own. Together they describe a unified effort aimed at every stage of the vote: who gets registered, whose names sit on the rolls, who can walk into a polling place and even how the ballots will get counted.

Subscribe now

Armed agents at the polls

In 1865, with the Civil War nearly won, Congress made it a federal crime for any U.S. officer to bring “troops or armed men” to a place where an election is held, unless needed “to repel the armed enemies of the United States.” The original law also allowed federal forces “to keep the peace at the polls.” Congress repealed that exception in 1909, leaving peacekeeping at polling places to state and local authorities.

For decades, the Justice Department’s election-crimes manual warned that the statute makes it a felony to send armed agents to the vicinity of open polls. By June, as Democracy Docket notes, the department had taken the manual off its website.

For most of this year, the regime and its allies have been threatening to violate this law. In February, Steve Bannon said on his War Room podcast that ICE would “surround the polls” in November. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said she “can’t guarantee” an ICE agent won’t be around a polling location. Heather Honey, then DHS’s deputy assistant secretary for election integrity, assured top state election officials on a Feb. 25 call, “There will be no ICE presence at polling locations,” but in March then-Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, now the attorney general, suggested otherwise, asking the audience at CPAC, “Why is there objection to sending ICE officers to polling places?”

The mixed signals continued. In May, acting ICE Director Todd Lyons wrote to Colorado’s secretary of state that “there is no reason for ICE officers and special agents to be deployed to polling places.” But on Sept. 1, Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin said ICE could be at polling places if “we’re serving a warrant on someone that we have been actively tracking down.” Two weeks later, FBI Director Kash Patel told the Senate Judiciary Committee the bureau has election crimes coordinators in all 56 field offices, “so you bet we’re gonna have them there.” When Sen. Peter Welch (D-VT) asked whether Patel had earlier ruled that out, Patel answered, “When did you hear that? It’s just another lie.”

On Sept. 13, White House border czar Tom Homan told Fox News there had been “not one instance” of ICE operating at a sensitive location, “to include polling places.” This, to use the legal term, is total B.S.

According to the Democracy Forward lawsuit and local reporting, as early as May, ICE agents swarmed a vehicle during a traffic stop in the parking lot of an active San Antonio polling site. ICE also showed up at a vote center in Simi Valley, California, during a June rush of voters and confronted a poll worker in Syracuse, New York, mid-shift.

Elias notes that ICE is staffed with agents who are primed to intimidate voters. “They lack the discipline and training of other federal law enforcement officers,” he wrote. “They have proven themselves willing to do anything Trump asks.”

Hennepin County, Minnesota, which joined the suit Wednesday, says DHS investigators have entered its election spaces three times in the past five months. In response, the county has drafted no fewer than eight contingency plans for federal agents at election sites, which make up 38 percent of its risk-mitigation planning for November. The amended complaint, brought by Democracy Forward, now also names the Justice Department, the FBI, Patel and Attorney General Todd Blanche. It adds a claim under the Voting Rights Act’s ban on voter intimidation, and it asks the court to act before Election Day.

Ninety-nine million records and dozens of arrests

Over the past year, ICE’s investigative arm went looking for the people who help others register to vote. The result has been a full-fledged attack on the civic infrastructure that supports voter participation.

Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) reviewed at least 82 nonprofits in Pennsylvania, according to internal ICE records Democracy Forward obtained through its FOIA lawsuit. It flagged the state chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations for “further investigation.” It even went after Zumiez, a clothing chain popular with young skaters that has partnered with voter registration groups at youth events.

Its efforts have turned up zip in nearly all cases. In New Jersey, for example, HSI reviewed at least 41 organizations and found “no derogatory information” on any of them. One document even contemplated sending undercover agents to “initiate prosecutions and dismantle illicit facilitation networks,” but the records, at least so far, do not show that any such operation took place.

In Ohio, HSI identified Black Fork Strategies, a voter-engagement firm, as “associated with several aliens registered to vote in Cuyahoga County.” It is not clear what “associated with” even means here. But that “association” was apparently enough to go hog wild with search warrants. A June 8 email to ICE leadership announced joint HSI and FBI warrants, along with interviews of more than 100 current and former employees of an organization whose name was redacted from the document. That same week, federal agents searched the offices of the Ohio Organizing Collaborative, a voter registration group founded by Black Fork’s founder, Kirk Noden. Michael Waldman, president of the Brennan Center for Justice, called the raid “an outrageous fishing expedition.”

And that was of course the main point of these investigations and searches: to intimidate and silence groups that are lawfully helping people register and get to the polls. Elias underscored the stakes: “To be clear, it is not illegal to register voters. It is not illegal to encourage voting.”

Investigators were also amassing voter data. An HSI status report dated May 25 lists 50.6 million voter records from the Justice Department, plus another 48.4 million obtained by “DAS Heather Honey” through “independent sources of information.” (Note that last bit; I’ll come back to it.)

Keep a close eye on Honey, the “DAS” in that line who joined DHS in August 2025 as deputy assistant secretary for election integrity. She now serves as a senior adviser to the ICE director and senior counselor to Mullin.

After the 2020 election, Honey’s investigations firm worked as a subcontractor to Cyber Ninjas, the company Arizona Senate Republicans hired to review Maricopa County’s ballots. The review had its moments. Chasing a QAnon theory about secretly marked ballots, reviewers scanned ballots under UV light “to see if there were watermarks,” the Senate Republicans’ audit liaison, Ken Bennett, told PolitiFact. They also checked the paper for bamboo fibers to test a claim that 40,000 ballots had been flown in from Asia. Ironically, and rather awkwardly, Honey helped draft the final report, which ended up confirming Biden’s win.

Given her background in conspiracies and election denialism, we should be on our guard. Elias zeroed in on the 48.4 million records Honey allegedly obtained that were being used by HSI investigators, particularly the identity of her “independent sources”:

“The documents do not identify these independent sources. We do not know whether some are records she brought with her from her work outside of government. We do not know if they were given to her by outside election-denier groups.”

Both datasets, the report says, “are currently with iLab for secondary enrichment and identification of high-value targets,” whatever that means. Elias also flagged a July report in the records showing voter roll data from six states awaiting entry into Palantir’s ELITE system (yes, Peter Thiel’s Palantir, God help us), which ICE uses to find people for deportation. He noted it is unclear whether the data was entered.

Lawyers are still trying to make sense of the HSI status report, and they have flagged other disturbing passages. The polling-place suit cites one in which ICE describes “ingesting processed voter roll data into the ELITE enforcement system.” That raises the possibility that voter roll data now sits in a platform built by a private surveillance company, although a source familiar with the matter told Democracy Docket that the data was not integrated into ELITE.

This isn’t just a Homeland Security matter anymore. According to the complaint, by July a weekly HSI fraud report that tracked voter-fraud arrests was being routed to White House staff.

The DOJ is also involved. ICE claims 36 criminal arrests and 56 administrative arrests related to voter fraud “so far this year.” Across 2025, HSI’s voter-fraud initiatives generated more than 2,000 leads and 68 cases presented for prosecution. As early as December 2025, the agency stated it had begun working with Customs and Border Protection, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and the Justice Department to identify noncitizens who registered or voted unlawfully, for prosecution or deportation. As Popular Information reported, the agency noted that deportation for unlawful voting generally requires neither a conviction nor proof that the person knew the vote was illegal. And in August, the New York Times reported that green card holders applying for citizenship had been placed in deportation proceedings for registering to vote.

They want the voting machines

With less than a month until Election Day, election deniers are pushing Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick to assert “regulatory authority” over the machines states use to cast and count ballots, Democracy Docket’s Matt Cohen reported. The request relies on a 2019 Trump executive order on foreign threats to the technology supply chain. The plan’s proponents contend that, under it, a Commerce finding that voting machines pose a national security risk would allow the department to “impose mitigation or prohibition.” Cohen noted that such a finding “could open the door for the federal government to take control of electronic voting.”

The plan’s leading champion is Tina Peters, the former Mesa County, Colorado, clerk convicted in 2024 over a plot to breach her county’s voting machines in search of “proof” that the 2020 election was stolen from Trump. Gov. Jared Polis infuriatingly commuted her nine-year sentence this year, and now she’s predictably at it again. Trump, who had pressured Colorado for months, welcomed her to the Oval Office on June 30.

Peters’s written plan is measured in tone, but her public statements are not. In August, she said Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth (meaning, the U.S. military) “needs to go in and demand to have these machines in their custody.”

Election denier Cleta Mitchell has tried this before. On Jan. 2, 2021, she was on the line when Trump pressed Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger to “find” enough votes to reverse his loss there, and she pushed state officials for voting records during the call. Days later, after her firm said it was “concerned” by her role, she resigned from Foley & Lardner. She went on to run the so-called Election Integrity Network, which held summits for right-wing activists in swing states, under the Conservative Partnership Institute, a group backed by money from Trump’s political operation. Unfun fact: The network’s Pennsylvania chapter, Pennsylvania Fair Elections, was founded by Honey, whom ProPublica described as “a protege of Cleta Mitchell.”

On Tuesday, Mitchell posted online that Lutnick should act “TODAY” to ensure voting systems in the 2026 elections are not “compromised or manipulated by enemies, foreign or domestic.”

David Becker, executive director of the Center for Election Innovation & Research, told Democracy Docket, “I can’t say this any more clearly: The commerce secretary has no authority.” The Constitution leaves the times, places and manner of congressional elections to the states, subject to changes Congress makes by law.

ICE also appears to want control over the voting machines. The agenda for a May 27 HSI voter-fraud call included the headings “Counties with 2020 Results” and “Voter Machines.” Their contents are redacted.

It’s suppressing registration efforts, but not the early vote

The effects of these efforts are already showing up in voter outreach. A nonprofit that works with African immigrant communities in Hennepin County reported that its door-knock response rate fell to between 5 and 10 percent this year, down from 40 to 45 percent in past cycles. It has recorded one voter registration this year, compared with hundreds before.

The League of United Latin American Citizens, or LULAC, which works to register Latino voters, says it has scaled back get-out-the-vote work in 10 communities and canceled registration drives in five states.

Common Cause says members have dropped out of election-protection training for fear of encountering ICE.

UnidosUS has reserved $121,000 to respond to immigration enforcement at polling places. It says that money would otherwise have reached about 19,200 more voters.

The response from voting rights groups has been to urge voters to vote early, either in person or by mail-in ballot returned to an official drop box. That appears to have produced tangible results. It’s too soon for firm predictions, but Democrats’ early-vote margin is running well ahead of where it stood at the same point in 2022 and 2024. As Simon Rosenberg noted in his Hopium Chronicles newsletter on Wednesday, citing TargetEarly data:

The early vote is picking up. Here’s the current national early vote via TargetEarly (10/6/26 758pm update). This comparison is 27 days before Election Day in each of the last three cycles:

  • 2022 D+22

  • 2024 D+23

  • 2026 D+29

Elias warns that the voter data the federal government is amassing can be turned against eligible voters. “A name change, a new address, a missing piece of information — the administration can turn almost anything into an excuse to remove voters from the rolls.”

But voters can fight purges at the polling place. In most states, a registered voter whose name is missing from the rolls can cast a provisional ballot, which is counted if officials confirm the voter is eligible under state law. Voters should ask what steps they must take to have it counted and how to check its status. In tight House races, provisional or cured ballots can often decide the outcome.

The Trump regime’s efforts to intimidate voters and suppress the vote will continue, and they will likely grow more desperate. It has even declined to invite observers from the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe, which has monitored every federal election since 2002.

In a literal sense, then, we are on our own, and it is up to us. But take heart. In the coming weeks, tens of millions of voters will defy the regime’s scare tactics and thwart its elaborate electoral schemes with a massive, undeniable blue wave. Together, we can, and will, vote the spineless GOP out of power and finally check the would-be king.

11:00 AM

The Metric Is Not The Mission: The Illusion Of Knowing Us [Techdirt]

The Metric Is Not the Mission is a ten-part examination of how Big Tech moved from building and expanding the open internet to increasingly shaping it around its own metrics, incentives and assumptions. Across the series, the argument follows the evolution of the platform economy—from the optimism of the early internet to the growing tensions around power, prediction, geopolitics, accountability and the future of digital life.

The series will be published in two parts each week over five weeks, with each installment building on the one before it. At the end of the series, the complete essay will be brought together in a single PDF edition, providing the full argument in one place.

Part VI: The Illusion of Knowing Us
Part V explored what is lost when an open system becomes a finished one. Part VI returns to the question at the heart of the series: what happens when the ability to measure human behavior creates the illusion that human beings themselves have become fully understood?

There is an old temptation that accompanies every period of technological progress: the belief that a sufficiently complete collection of facts will eventually become indistinguishable from understanding. It is an idea that predates computers by centuries. Enlightenment thinkers imagined that careful observation might reveal the laws governing society just as Newton had revealed the laws governing motion. Nineteenth-century bureaucracies believed that censuses, maps and statistics would render increasingly complex populations legible to governments. Twentieth-century corporations discovered that markets could be segmented, modelled and predicted through ever more sophisticated forms of consumer research. Every era has entertained, in one form or another, the hope that enough information might finally dissolve uncertainty.

The digital age inherited that ambition and expanded it beyond anything previous generations could have imagined. Never before have private organizations possessed such detailed knowledge of everyday human behavior. The major technology platforms know what captures our attention, how long we hesitate before making a decision, which conversations draw us back repeatedly, what time we wake, when we travel, where we shop, what we read, which videos we abandon after twenty seconds and which ones persuade us to remain for twenty minutes. Individually, these fragments appear almost trivial. Collectively, they amount to one of the most ambitious efforts in history to observe human behavior at planetary scale.

The achievement is extraordinary. It is also deeply misleading. Observation and understanding are not the same thing. The distinction is easy to overlook because the predictive power of these systems has become genuinely remarkable. Recommendation algorithms often anticipate our preferences before we consciously recognize them ourselves. Navigation applications predict our journeys with astonishing accuracy. Streaming platforms learn our habits so quickly that their suggestions can feel almost uncanny. The practical success of these systems encourages a subtle but important assumption: if behavior can be predicted with sufficient precision, perhaps behavior itself has been understood.

And this may be the most consequential consequence of the platform age. The more of human behavior platforms learned to measure, the easier it became to believe that human beings themselves had become legible. Clicks became preferences. Networks became communities. Attention became interest. Prediction became understanding. Metrics became meaning. The platforms could see more of us than any institution in history and gradually became less capable of seeing what their measurements left out.

Yet this conclusion rests upon a philosophical confusion that extends far beyond technology. More than half a century ago, the economist and philosopher Friedrich Hayek argued that modern societies possess a form of knowledge that can never be fully centralized. Much of what people know is contextual, local and often impossible to articulate explicitly. A shopkeeper understands the rhythms of a neighborhood without reducing them to data points. A teacher recognizes the confidence of a struggling student before it becomes measurable through examination results. A parent notices subtle changes in a child’s mood that no questionnaire could adequately capture. This knowledge is not irrational. It is simply embedded within lived experience rather than abstract information.

Around the same time, the scientist and philosopher Michael Polanyi expressed the idea even more succinctly. “We know more than we can tell,” he wrote. Human understanding depends not only upon explicit facts but upon intuition, memory, culture, relationships and forms of judgement that resist codification. Much of what makes societies function exists precisely because it cannot be reduced to a formal rule.

Technology has always struggled with this distinction because computation requires representation. Before an algorithm can optimize anything, the world must first be translated into variables that can be measured. Human beings become profiles. Relationships become networks. Interests become categories. Attention becomes duration. Influence becomes engagement. These abstractions are indispensable because without them computation would be impossible. Yet every abstraction also excludes dimensions of reality that prove difficult to quantify.

The political scientist James C. Scott devoted an entire book to this problem. Modern states, he argued, simplify the societies they govern in order to make them administratively manageable. Forests become inventories of timber rather than ecosystems. Cities become grids. Citizens become statistics. These simplifications are not inherently malicious; they are necessary for governing large populations. Problems arise when institutions begin mistaking their simplified representations for reality itself. The map becomes more authoritative than the territory it was intended to describe.

Digital platforms confront a remarkably similar dilemma. Their models of human behavior are necessarily simplified because every computational system requires simplification. The question is not whether these models are imperfect; they are. The more consequential question is what happens when organizations become so successful within their own representations of the world that they gradually lose contact with the world those representations were created to explain.

One sees hints of this throughout the contemporary digital landscape. Platforms confidently predict what will retain our attention while appearing increasingly uncertain about what earns our trust. They identify emerging trends with astonishing speed while repeatedly struggling to distinguish civic participation from performative outrage. They optimize conversations according to measurable interactions while overlooking qualities such as reflection, empathy, restraint or wisdom because none of these can easily be incorporated into engagement metrics.

This should not surprise given that trust is not merely repeated interaction. Community is not simply network density and friendship is not the frequency of communication. Curiosity is not equivalent to clicking.

These distinctions may sound obvious when expressed in ordinary language. They become far less obvious once organizations begin making billions of decisions each day through computational systems that necessarily privilege what can be counted over what can only be experienced.

There is another irony here that deserves attention. For decades, Silicon Valley celebrated itself as uniquely capable of understanding people because it possessed unprecedented quantities of behavioral data. Traditional institutions, like governments, universities or newspapers, were often portrayed as slow, hierarchical and detached from ordinary life. Technology companies, by contrast, claimed to learn directly from users. Every click became feedback, every interaction generated insight and every product update reflected continuous adaptation to human behavior. For many years, this confidence appeared justified.

Today, however, one encounters an increasingly curious paradox. Never have companies measured human behavior so exhaustively, and never have so many users felt so profoundly misunderstood by the systems surrounding them. Social media platforms seem endlessly surprised by phenomena that emerge beyond the boundaries of their models: declining public trust, digital fatigue, growing skepticism toward artificial intelligence, the desire for smaller communities, renewed interest in newsletters, blogs, private messaging groups and slower forms of communication that escape the logic of algorithmic optimization.

These developments often appear puzzling only because they are interpreted through behavioral models that assume more engagement necessarily reflects greater satisfaction. Yet anyone familiar with modern cities knows that constant traffic does not indicate affection for the road network. Congestion may simply reveal that people have few practical alternatives. Likewise, continued use of social media reveals remarkably little about whether users believe these platforms enrich their lives. Behavior alone cannot answer that question because behavior is shaped not only by preference but also by dependency, habit, professional necessity and the absence of viable substitutes.

This may be the deepest misunderstanding at the heart of Big Tech’s current predicament. The companies continue to believe that they understand society because they observe so much of its behavior. Increasingly, society appears unconvinced. People do not feel recognized merely because they have been accurately profiled. They do not experience prediction as understanding. If anything, the extraordinary precision with which platforms anticipate our habits has heightened our awareness of everything they fail to perceive: our uncertainty, our changing aspirations, our moral dilemmas, our search for meaning, and our persistent desire to belong to communities that are valued for something more enduring than their ability to generate engagement.

History suggests that this moment arrives sooner or later for every dominant institution. Power often produces the illusion of comprehension. Success encourages organizations to believe that because they have mastered the mechanics of a system, they have also grasped its purpose. Yet societies are not machines, and human beings have an inconvenient habit of changing the questions they ask long before institutions notice that the answers they continue providing have ceased to satisfy.

Perhaps that is the quiet reckoning confronting Big Tech today. Not that it has forgotten how to build extraordinary technology. Rather, it has become so accomplished at modelling human behavior that it has begun to overlook the one thing behavior can never fully reveal: what it actually means to be human.

Konstantinos Komaitis, PhD, is a veteran of developing and analysing Internet policy to ensure an open and global Internet.

DNC Sues Trump For Wasting $20 Million In Taxpayer Dollars On Ineffective Midterm Propaganda [Techdirt]

The Democratic party has announced they’re suing Donald Trump for his recent attempt to flood the midterm airwaves with propaganda he’s falsely claiming are “public service announcements.”

The DNC complaint was filed in federal court in Washington, and names the White House, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), and US Department of Homeland Security (DHS) as defendants in what the party calls “a blatant violation of the statutory ban on the use of appropriations for ‘publicity or propaganda purposes.”

As we recently noted, Donald Trump decided to flood the midterm airwaves with agitprop, including a recycled black and white advertisement from the 2024 election cycle featuring the president walking down a hallway promising to smite his perceived enemies. Given Trump’s abysmal polling it’s more likely to hurt than help midterm Republicans, but Trump’s gargantuan ego couldn’t help itself.

There are a few different ads in the campaign. The catch: the $20 million advertisement campaign was funded by taxpayers. That violated not only Federal Appropriations Laws restricting taxpayer-funded propaganda, but also other potential laws like the Hatch Act and the The Anti-Deficiency Act.

From the Democrats’ lawsuit:

“The use of public funds also places the DNC and Democratic candidates at an electoral disadvantage, even though the publicly funded propaganda advertisements are deeply unpopular with American voters, by preserving funds held by campaign committees and PACs—including MAGA Inc.—for other political expenditures.”

To try and pretend they weren’t violating multiple laws, dutiful Trumplings like FCC boss Brendan Carr repeatedly lied and claimed these were just public-service announcements — despite the fact that PSA legal exemptions require some actual government service or program to be advertised. Vice President JD Vance also lied about this when interviewed by the press this week, going so far as to falsely claim the Trump propaganda spots “were not partisan:”

Trump subsequently made a post to his personal propaganda website, Truth Social, claiming (for whatever that’s worth) that he’ll stop using taxpayer dollars and instead fund the ads “himself” (leverage his existing SuperPAC cash trove):

Granted this being Trump, there’s been no indication anything changed about the ads or how they are being funded, and Trump can’t legally direct his SuperPAC how to spend its money anyway. Early indications are that even if he does follow through on the promise to stop using taxpayer dollars for propaganda, the Trump administration won’t be reimbursing taxpayers for the cost of the ads that have already aired.

Republicans enjoy a massive financial advantage over Democrats, and are throwing half-a-billion dollars at midterm ad spending with the help of top donor and white supremacist Elon Musk.

They’re also doing everything possible to ignore or eliminate traditional restrictions on how that money is spent, whether we’re talking about the Supreme Court and FCC working in concert to give dark money groups the ability to spend unlimited cash on steeply discounted broadcast TV ads, or Brendan Carr weakening robocall rules so they can bombard voters with AI-generated robocalls.

The great irony remains that Trump is increasingly so unpopular due to his empty promises, pointless wars, blatant corruption, and constant bumbling, that all the money in the world doesn’t seem to be providing any real tactical advantage. If anything, slathering the airwaves with Trump’s face seems more inclined to undermine Republicans in key House and Senate midterm races.

05:00 AM

5 Custom Gift Book Ideas for Readers [The Business of Printing Books]

5 Custom Gift Book Ideas for Readers

It’s never been easier to create unique or personalized gifts online. People have always loved gifting books, but today it’s incredibly easy to make a custom, personalized book as a gift that recipients will cherish.

Because Lulu offers individual, book-of-one printing on demand, you can create a unique file, upload it, and order that exact book. There is so much demand for personalized books that an entire new industry built around using AI and print-on-demand has emerged over the last two years. 

We call it generative print commerce, and it’s built on the idea that LLMs can easily ingest a user’s inputs, lean on templates the business develops, and quickly generate a unique, completely personalized book for the buyer. Then the book is printed through Lulu’s API, which enables a distinct file for each book.

But today, we’re going to focus on five options you can easily make yourself to give as a gift. 


Create a Book for a Gift

To create a book on Lulu, you’ll need two files:

  1. An interior PDF with all of the pages for your book
  2. A cover PDF including the front, back, and spine

Note that you can use our Cover Creator to make your cover file while you’re uploading your interior files. 

I recommend watching this short video that shows how uploading your files works. 

When you make your own book, you’ll need to gather all the content together to create the PDF. That means creating the pages, editing images, and laying them all out. Check out some of our guides and templates to help you create your book files.

5 Customizable Book Ideas

These five book ideas all make great personalized gifts. And they’re all pretty easy to make on your own and have printed by Lulu. 

#1: Make a Personalized Calendar

Custom calendars make amazing gifts. Trust me. I give them all the time. I don’t think I’ll ever buy another generic wall calendar at Target; not when I can turn 14 images into a personalized calendar so easily. 

Watch this 3-minute video to see how easy it is to make a custom calendar:

All you need are the images! Maybe you took a vacation this year; let your friends and family relive those memories. Kids and pets make great subjects for calendars too! Or you might show off some of your original art.  

Our calendars can include a range of months—from 2 to 18. And you’ll have the option to add custom holidays. 

Make a Custom Art or Photo Wall Calendar | Lulu
Design & create your own personalized art or photo calendar online for free. With high quality print on demand, buy 1 or sell 1,000 copies of your calendar!

#2: Custom Notebooks & Journals

Another popular and common book that is great to personalize is a journals and notebooks. 

We have premade templates for all kinds of common notebook designs, like lined, dot grid, or blank. And we have some simple planner, habit tracker, or task tracker templates too. All are free to download and ready to use. 

You can always create a custom interior file too, personalized based on the recipient’s own habits or the way they like to journal. 

If you’re in need of a simple, inexpensive way to make your cover, I suggest Canva or Adobe Express.

Or, of course, you can use the built-in Cover Creator. But for a notebook or journal, the cover really needs to stand out, so you may need a more sophisticated tool. 

#3: Create a Memory Book

There are some really cool businesses out there that make creating a memory book—like a memoir, biography, or similar—incredibly easy. One example is My Forever Books, a business that takes old text messages and arranges them into a personalized gift book. 

You can always build the book yourself too. It’s a longer process, but memory books aren’t novels. You don’t need to aim for a specific word count or follow a detailed plot. Simply recount the events or history that you want to share and type it up! 

Gather family stories, detail an adventure you’ve had, or trace the history of your ancestors: memoirs are the perfect book to create lasting family memories.

Create Your Book

Learn how to prepare your print files, upload, create a cover, and publish on Lulu.

Start My Project

#4: Turn iPhone Pics Into Photo Books

With cameras in all of our pockets, we’ve never had more material for creating photo books. 

With high-quality paper and ink, as well as hardcover binding, a printed photo book is the perfect unique gift to show off your pictures and bring joy to friends and family. 

Photo books are one of my favorite kinds of books to give, but they can be tough to create. Luckily, there are lots of great ways to design a photo book without spending a penny. So while Instagram is good for sharing photos today, a photo book is the perfect gift to capture those pictures for a lifetime.

#5: Cook Up a Cookbook

Finally, we have cookbooks. If you like to cook or you’ve got a family member who loves to cook, giving a recipe book is a wonderful gift. Want to gather your mom’s apple pie recipe and your uncle’s  hand-pulled noodles and whatever else your family loves to cook? Create a unique recipe book!

Creating a cookbook means designing the pages just like a memoir or photo book. You’ll want to check out our Book Creation Guide for specs, but our templates (for InDesign or Affinity Publisher) help make it easier to lay out those pages.

You can also find templates for Microsoft Word on their site, but I find Word to be a poor choice for cookbooks—it’s difficult to keep spacing and page layout consistent.

Regardless of how you choose to design your cookbook, you know your family will cherish those recipes for years to come. The perfect (and most delicious) gift you can give, though you might want to consider making one of the recipes to go along with the book!

Making This a Memorable Holiday

Showcase your creative side to your friends and family when you create something for them this year. It’s never been easier to make unique gifts, and even though the shopping season is fast approaching, you still have time! Get started today and make this holiday season one to remember.

FBI Whistleblower Says Emil Bove Directed Agents To Investigate Anti-ICE Protesters [Techdirt]

Hey, this guy is a judge now! Let that seep in for a bit.

Emil Bove used to work for the DOJ. Then he went to work for Trump, acting as his personal lawyer starting in 2023. Upon Trump’s return to office, he was brought back to the DOJ to serve as an “associate deputy attorney general” — a position that didn’t actually require Bove to be subjected to the Senate confirmation process.

Bove was fine with this. And being one of Trump’s guys, he decided to use this new position to aid and abet illegal activities engaged in by ICE and the DHS. It was Bove who first instructed DOJ lawyers to tell courts to “fuck themselves” when faced with rulings that demanded the administration respect the law.

It was also Emil Bove who pushed hard for the “murder people in boats” program the Trump administration has been engaged in ever since it first decided people from Central and South America needed to be killed to prevent them from eventually reaching the US border.

This show of absolute loyalty was rewarded. Emil Bove is no longer just a guy who thinks ignoring court orders and murdering people in international waters is a fine way to run a government. He’s now capable of turning an entire circuit against Americans and their rights, thanks to his installation as a Third Circuit Appeals Court judge.

There’s no reason he should be given this position. He’s entirely untrustworthy and has, at best, only a cursory relationship to the rule of law so often claimed as the high ground by Trump and his bootlickers.

There was plenty of evidence already on the record that should have blocked this nomination, but all it took to install him in a position to do serious damage to an entire nation was a unified MAGA front that could override any opposition from the Democratic Party minority in the Senate.

It doesn’t take much to get a judge installed, as Trump has repeatedly proven. It takes far, far more to remove one who is so compromised they can’t possibly be trusted. The wheels are greased and the trolley car has been directed to engage in maximum cruelty. And that’s not going to change even if more dirt on Bove emerges.

Nevertheless, we will engage with this dirt, which comes to us via a whistleblower complaint about Bove’s activities during his relatively brief tenure as a top DOJ prosecutor.

Jill Fields, a former supervisory intelligence analyst in the FBI’s Los Angeles Field Office, made a formal whistleblower complaint to Senate Judiciary Committee leaders over the federal response to anti-ICE protest activity around federal buildings, as well as in a residential area, early last year.

[…]

Fields says Emil Bove, then the acting deputy attorney general, told the head of the field office to open an investigation into activities outside the federal building even though, she says, the activities were protected free speech. Separately, she says the White House gave a directive to FBI Director Kash Patel to investigate a group of protesters using megaphones during immigration enforcement operations after FBI agents had conducted a check into the conduct and declined to open an investigation.

There’s no pretending this doesn’t sound exactly like something Bove would have directed and approved. After all, he was already giving his blessing to boat strikes and courtroom “fuck you’s” at this point. The whistleblower report [PDF] goes into more detail about Bove’s actions, demands, and general disregard for constitutional rights.

First, it details how FBI agents and officers were taken off task to help Trump fight his War on Los Angeles that was a vindictive offshoot of his general War on Migrants. It also details the administration’s desire to do these things while adding as little as possible to the public record.

From the very start of the second Trump administration, Ms. Fields and her colleagues at the Los Angeles Field Office were instructed by Field Office leadership, including the Assistant
Director in Charge (ADIC), the Special Agents in Charge (SACs), the Assistant Special Agents in Charge (ASACs), and the Senior Supervisory Intelligence Analysts (SSIAs), through emails and directives in meetings, to support what they called a nationwide “big immigration push” to take
place across multiple “weeks of action” that would begin in February and continue throughout the year.

The initiative included assigning agents Title 8 authorities, directing intelligence analysts to conduct checks on lists of immigrants, and supporting immigration-related arrests across FBI Field Offices nationwide. During meetings on this initiative, Ms. Fields experienced supervisors encouraging her and others to not put things in writing and noticed many directives and subsequent discussions were conducted in face-to-face meetings rather than over email.

Not only were agents redirected to support the “big immigration push,” they were told not to create any written documentation of their actions in support of Trump’s bigotry.

The FBI no longer served the public or the ideal of public safety. What FBI agents in the Los Angeles area were instructed to do was make their superiors look good in front of the boss.

[A]gents were pulled off active cartel cases to satisfy what her supervisor, , described as “optics” designed to “make a show for the president.”

Meanwhile, ICE and DHS were busy making themselves look worse. Whatever wasn’t an obvious lie about the situation in Los Angeles was a series of “boots on the ground” debacles that failed to produces the thousands of migrant arrests the administration had already told its voting base were all but inevitable.

Either Bove sensed some impending displeasure or was just a hideous human being who should never have been allowed to become a judge. Whatever the case, Bove — while still holding a position as a top DOJ prosecutor — directed the FBI to start investigating peaceful protesters simply because they were protesting the government that now employed him.

In late January or early February 2025, shortly before a standing 4:00 pm Pacific Timemeeting including SACs, ASACs, SSIAs, and the Los Angeles Criminal Program’s Mission Support Analyst regarding the immigration push, [redacted] came to Ms. Fields’s office, shut the door, and informed her that Department of Justice (DOJ) former Acting Deputy Attorney General Emil Bove had instructed Akil Davis, the ADIC of the Los Angeles FBI Field Office, to open an investigation into any anti-ICE and CBP protesters demonstrating at federal buildings in Los Angeles.

The FBI knows constitutionally protected activity can never form the basis for an investigation. And it ignores this knowledge with alarming regularity. But this is Trump’s DOJ, which not only spends most of its time satisfying his bigotry and revenge fantasies, but also hasn’t met a right it doesn’t feel comfortable violating (Second Amendment excluded).

That Bove would be the lapdog Trump wants to see in the world is unsurprising. What is surprising is that an agent would actually file a whistleblower report while overseen by an administration that has been rooting out dissent since day one, and would gladly hang any dissenter if it didn’t have to hammer out a contract with Dana White first. Anyone who isn’t a loyalist will soon be unemployed. And those who dare to peep above the parapet will be the first against the wall.

This report is essential. But it’s being handed to people who can’t do anything about it and raises issues the current administration views as features, rather than bugs. And it certainly won’t get Bove booted back to where he should be: just another Trump lawyer wondering when he’s going to get paid for protecting Mr. MAGA from the consequences of his own actions.

Daily Deal: The iPhotography Training Course [Techdirt]

From exposure to shutter speed and everything in between, this award-winning training walks you through the nuts and bolts behind capturing truly stunning photos. iPhotography is the leading online photography choice of aspiring photographers worldwide, and it’s easy to see why. Each of this course’s 18 modules has been carefully constructed and feature personal mentorship from award-winning photographers along the way, taking you from zero to hero with your camera in no time. It’s on sale for $40.

Note: The Techdirt Deals Store is powered and curated by StackSocial. A portion of all sales from Techdirt Deals helps support Techdirt. The products featured do not reflect endorsements by our editorial team.

RSSSiteUpdated
XML About Tagaini Jisho on Tagaini Jisho 2026-10-11 01:00 AM
XML Arch Linux: Releases 2026-10-11 06:00 AM
XML Carlson Calamities 2026-10-11 06:00 AM
XML Debian News 2026-10-11 06:00 AM
XML Debian Security 2026-10-11 01:00 AM
XML debito.org 2026-10-11 06:00 AM
XML dperkins 2026-10-11 02:00 AM
XML F-Droid - Free and Open Source Android App Repository 2026-10-11 06:00 AM
XML General Union 2026-10-11 06:00 AM
XML GIMP 2026-10-11 06:00 AM
XML Japan Bash 2026-10-11 01:00 AM
XML Japan English Teacher Feed 2026-10-11 01:00 AM
XML Kanji of the Day 2026-10-11 06:00 AM
XML Kanji of the Day 2026-10-11 06:00 AM
XML Let's Encrypt 2026-10-11 06:00 AM
XML Marc Jones 2026-10-11 06:00 AM
XML Marjorie's Blog 2026-10-11 06:00 AM
XML OpenStreetMap Japan 2026-10-11 06:00 AM
XML OsmAnd Blog 2026-10-11 06:00 AM
XML Pluralistic: Daily links from Cory Doctorow 2026-10-11 01:00 AM
XML Popehat 2026-10-11 06:00 AM
XML Ramen Adventures 2026-10-11 06:00 AM
XML Release notes from server 2026-10-11 06:00 AM
XML Seth Godin's Blog on marketing, tribes and respect 2026-10-11 02:00 AM
XML SNA Japan 2026-10-11 02:00 AM
XML Tatoeba Project Blog 2026-10-11 01:00 AM
XML Techdirt 2026-10-11 06:00 AM
XML The Business of Printing Books 2026-10-11 06:00 AM
XML The Luddite 2026-10-11 06:00 AM
XML The Popehat Report 2026-10-11 02:00 AM
XML The Status Kuo 2026-10-11 02:00 AM
XML The Stranger 2026-10-11 06:00 AM
XML Tor Project blog 2026-10-11 06:00 AM
XML TorrentFreak 2026-10-11 01:00 AM
XML what if? 2026-10-11 01:00 AM
XML Wikimedia Commons picture of the day feed 2026-10-03 03:00 PM
XML xkcd.com 2026-10-11 01:00 AM